Talk:U.S. House formalizes rules for Trump impeachment proceedings

Review of revision 4526449 [Passed]

 * I restored the Schiff prediction - NPR reported: "Schiff has made it clear that he does not plan to go to court to enforce subpoenas for testimony and documents from those administration officials who have refused to comply. Instead, he has maintained that those Trump officials 'will be building a very powerful case against the president for obstruction — an article of impeachment based on obstruction.'" - i.e. Schiff predicts that officials will build a case for impeachment based on obstruction. --DannyS712 (talk) 21:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I saw that passage. What he's saying there is not a prediction that "any impeachment would be based on Trump's alleged obstruction of justice".  To replace the unverified sentence with something else that would be verified by the source passage, one would have to make nontrivial choices, so it was clearly not something a reviewer could do without self-disqualifying. --Pi zero (talk) 21:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Edit request
editprotected

Please add Category:Impeachment of Donald Trump. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Done. --Pi zero (talk) 21:49, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Edit
editprotected There's a loose ">" after the vote count. Heavy Water (talk) 13:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ --SVTCobra 15:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)