Talk:U.S. government report says climate change is human-made

Review of revision 4362571 [Passed]

 * I'm sorry if any of my actions made you feel bad. We'll work it out.
 * I did have time to look at all of your edit summaries this time, Pi zero, but it's not so much giving up on looking at them as I just never got that much out of them at any point. Until recently, I didn't know that you even meant them as instructive or that you were addressing them at any one person specifically.  A two-word edit summary only tells the reader so much. "Source-check" can mean that you checked a source (but can also mean any of several other things) but doesn't say what you were looking for, whether you found it or whether or not it was important.
 * I don't think you should put more effort into your edit summaries than you are currently putting. There's only some extent to which that's either your job or your place. Wikinews doesn't have an editor in chief.  It has a community.
 * If there's a solution, it's not more words. It's more people and more perspectives. Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)