Talk:U.S. tariffs on Chinese solar panels to be contested

Sorry, you can't do that. -- Shakata Ga Nai ^_^ 17:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This should have failed review or been corrected anyway as a showstopper part of a review. An article with an unambiguous url indiciating it was from, and on, a Reuters source was 'supposedly' from the NYT. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I hope you do realize the Reuters/NYT reference was a mistake. The link that he has is exactly the same article that I linked, it is just at a different url.  Also, quite a bit of the revisions that were made was nothing but organizational changes which, is a matter of someone believes an article should be presented.  I find it quite interesting that there wasn't a single substantive change in the article rather, the vast majority of the changes were commas, word choice and re-ordering.  I thought we're about reporting the truth from a neutral point of view.  If that's the case then the failed comment I think is totally out of line.--JaylanHaley (talk) 18:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Category
Please add to Category:Renewable energy. Thanks. —Elekhh (talk) 23:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 08:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)