Talk:UK reverses position on Navy personnel selling their stories

consider using the tag if you are in the process of working on an article. --SVTCobra 01:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I'll let you keep working in peace, as I see your changes are frequent, but this new title is not workable. --SVTCobra 01:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

This is a reversal of position, right? Shouldn't the article reflect that? --SVTCobra 02:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * nevermind --SVTCobra 02:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I cleaned up the grammar a lot because it was really bothering me. I don't like the last paragraph, it seems really biased, but I didn't want to delete it outright. Can someone take a look at it, check which claims are verified, and either flesh it out or cut out the rest? --57.69.9.19 13:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

reversal
The article, unlike all the sources, does not seem to reflect that the UK has banned them from selling stories. --SVTCobra 22:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)