Talk:Wikinews 2020: An 'Original reporting' year in review

Reviewing
This is just a wild thought, but, is it possible for me to review some of the summaries WSS has added, while WSS reviews some of the summaries I wrote, in order to distribute the review that pi might have to undertake completely, otherwise? •–• 08:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I see no procedural objection to doing so. When noting a summary as verified, one should likely sign it, identifying both who did the verifying and, in case something were to be edited later, as-of-when. --Pi zero (talk) 12:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * In the table above, one can sign in the verified, if that is what we are doing. •–• 13:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I've linked the section numbers in the table to the sections in the article. Sometimes Firefox (though not Opera, I notice) takes me to a spot in the article vertically just below the heading of the linked section (so, some caution may be indicated in that regard). --Pi zero (talk) 15:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Precedent
--Pi zero (talk) 15:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Lede
I'm guessing the draft was a place-holder modeled on the 2014 article. However, our OR output pattern has been quite complicated, and 'increasing' didn't seem safe to say. I'm thinking, since it's short, meta-information, and I did keep my edit down to what was needful, I should still be safe for reviewing it. --Pi zero (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)