Talk:Woman fined in Spain under new 'Gag Law'

Neutrality
Analysis I noticed here, since I'm unable to do a review tonight. Perhaps fixable during review, but one way or another, should be addressed. --Pi zero (talk) 04:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * "The woman ... was offended" (interpretation) We might be able to say she indicated she was offended; simplest would be be to leave that bit out and just report what she posted. ✅
 * "However, the controversy is about why the woman was fined." &mdash; says who? Unattributed, that's analysis. ✅
 * "seems to be at the heart of the case" &mash; analysis. ✅
 * OK, thanks. I'll try to tidy those before you wake tomorrow. ... #3 is totally me, because the stupid sources don't explicitly say so ... alright, I'll work on it ... Good night. --SVTCobra 04:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I think it is ready now. The Spanish source was added just to establish that it went from local to international.  Cheers, --SVTCobra 05:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm also leveraging it to get the original Spanish of one or two quotes (I like to use translated quote when possible, as I consider it added value over what msm provides; I don't recall when I've ever seen English msm bother to tell its readers what the original non-English was). --Pi zero (talk) 13:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)