Talk:YouTube, Facebook blocked in Pakistan

NPOV note
I removed the haveyoursay question as it appeared leading, and implying that this isn't appropriate for the 21st century. Tempodivalse [talk]  17:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a good question, but I agree it's a bit leading. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts?   17:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course it's leading! Is the article NPOV? That is what matters. --Brian McNeil / talk 02:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia blocked
“Access to the online encyclopedia site Wikipedia and the photo sharing site Flickr was also restricted Thursday.”

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2010/05/20/general-as-pakistan-internet-crackdown_7621265.html?boxes=Homepagebusinessnews

21:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)~
 * ✅ --Diego Grez return fire 22:38, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Do you have to tell everyone what the sites are for.
Everybody knows what YouTube, Facebook, Wikipedia and Flickr are. I doubt if any Wikinews readers have never heard of these websites. And even if they haven't they can just click on the links. Why include their functions in the text? Kayau (talk) 01:29, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * We report for single-celled lifeforms on Mars; even if they just use our coverage as examples of how best to use 'The Queen's English'. --Brian McNeil / talk 02:23, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

What about adding
editprotected

What about adding WikimediaMention? Kayau (talk &middot; contribs) 11:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅, -- Cirt (talk) 11:27, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Cat please?
Done editprotected Please add --InfantGorilla (talk) 10:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)