Template talk:Peer reviewed/Passed

editprotected flag Please change has been reviewed to  has been  reviewed , to allow for informal reviews to use the standardised template. Please also edit the Template:Peer reviewed/Failed template in the same place. Regards, — μ 00:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * If we want infrastructural support for informal reviews, I would think we'd want to pointedly make them look different, by using a separate template &mdash; perhaps Informally reviewed? --Pi zero (talk) 01:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed; that would be a good option to take. I'm not sure as to how one would differentiate; colour isn't particularly important when differentiating, perhaps replacing the ambox with something else? — μ 01:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This should be brought up at the water cooler, to get broad community feedback on whether we want to institutionalize informal peer review, as well as to get more people's ideas about how to visually distinguish the templates. Meanwhile, I'm marking this request ❌.  --Pi zero (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)