Thread:Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents/Comments from feedback form - "This article has a ways to go ..."

This article has a ways to go grammatically. For instance, what does it mean that he/she has destroyed the leaks TO Julian Assange's site? Do you mean he/she has removed them from the site? Punctuation and capitalization aren't perfect either; it should read, "...between the pair, and has now..."

Furthermore I think this article uses too many quotations for things that could just be reworded.

Also I believe there's more weight put on the perspective of OpenLeaks than that of Wikileaks.