Thread:Comments:India: Karnataka closed for a day for protests over Mahadayi river share/Thank you for fucking up the NPOV, and shifting the focus, and incomplete information/reply (6)

Some suggestions.
 * Small changes can greatly improve things. When the original objection was raised here, there would still have been time to make a surgical adjustment to the article to improve it.
 * Leaving information out of an article is a dubious way to achieve neutrality; on the face of it, leaving out the BJP's objections because you don't agree doesn't seem neutral. If you are deliberately leaving out something under such circumstances, it'd be a good idea to leave a note on the collaboration page explaining it &mdash; not only for the reviewer (though I missed this issue during review, alas), but also for some third party such as came along in this case.
 * I don't think the outcome is direly problematic.
 * The objection at the start of this thread would have been more useful all around if it had confined itself to discussing ways of improving the neutrality of the article, treating SVTCobra as a colleague who shares that goal (which they are). It's even possible that SVTCobra also would have done better to have more confidence in the neutrality of the article to start with, which suggests that in fact the article may have suffered (somewhat) from the two of you not having enough confidence in each other.
 * Most of this thread would have seemed to me more appropriate on the collaboration page.