Thread:Comments:Internet security firm to donate revenue to charity after Anonymous protest of Westboro Baptist Church/Does no one see that WBC is the good guy in this story?/reply (2)

Your argument was considered and rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in Snyder v. Phelps (2011),

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2981429692939250360&q=snyder+v.+phelps+(2011)&hl=en&as_sdt=2003

in which it was held that the high nuisance general method of speech that is used by the WBC activists is fully protected speech.

Read that case. Then let me know where you think the Court erred. Even better, thank me and tell me that you learned something.