Thread:Comments:P=NP math problem reported solved/Comments from feedback form - "Too much internet buzz about t..."

Too much internet buzz about this thing. The story doesn't help. The comparisons to Perelman aren't apt. The title is misleading: a guy claimed to have solved the problem, nobody at any point found the proof convincing or even expressed much optimism about it, though they were open to being convinced (i.e. the paper wasn't obvious nonsense like a lot of such papers are). Within a few days enough problems had been found that the reviewers are basically saying "nice try". The author hasn't yet given up but it doesn't look likely that he can fix the problems.

Please change the title of the article to something like "Researcher claims solution to P vs NP math problem". The current title makes it sound like other mathematicians believe the proposed solution. They don't.