Thread:Comments:Same-sex marriage passes third reading in House of Commons/same sex marriage/reply (16)

Although on first read I could not understand your statement, "[w]hat do you have against men?", it is possible that you are not familiar with the word "suffrage." This refers not to pain but to voting.

America has killed over 50 million babies in the last 40 years since Roe v. Wade was decided without a single vote from Congress, by nine Supreme Court members who are all dead now.

Communist China has killed over 500 million babies, according to published reports, with its "one child" policy.

Almost half the time an abortion is committed, the child killed is male. So I'm certainly not "hating" on men or women when I posit that one of the offspring of the progressive movement is the notion of abortion on demand (which is not law in the USA as of today, but it is a goal.)  The same liberal Supreme Court justices who are happy to consult foreign law when formulating their decisions should probably be aware that only 5 countries out of 193 permit abortion on demand and certainly none of Europe.

But we're talking about perversity in marriage, which we never permitted among Indian tribes wishing to gain citizenship. Likewise. the 1862 Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act banned Mormons from practicing their version of "marriage equality." The Supreme Court has already found that laws banning polygamy are constitutional.

P.S., Please, please, don't tell us that you want to get pregnant solely to have an abortion, just for the experience and/or thrill of it. Yikes.