Thread:Comments:UK to ban export of lethal injection drugs to US/pelosi and our rights

Note: The following information was given me anonymously during a visit to Ft Stockton, Tx in Pecos County in reference to the conduct of employees at the Lynaugh Unit, part of the Texas Dept of Corrections facility, and while this report appears to have been false, I would like to state that there is reason to believe that the content of the report is consistent with the political objectives of some members of the US Congress and could conceivably be implemented if the public does not focus on their agenda. Tip:   The US Congress and their Criminal Justice Policy:   TDC Lynaugh Unit in Ft Stockton, Tx. This unit appears to be operating in the following manner with support from Gov Perry and the US Congress. Persons being interogated in the county jail and involving severe and life threatening paddlings and torture, which some say could involve virtually anything and thereby leave the inmates permanently disfigured or dead even upon receiving the first strike of a paddle on the bare buttocks and done in such a manner that causes a shock to the brain and spinal cord. Persons being interrogated there in the manner or method of A through Z questioning that may or may not have anything to do with the reason they are there, meant to stir up information about anything you ever did wrong, and for which resistance thereof to any question will result in a probably severe paddling, the first strike thereof which could cause your death could via this process be found guilty by the interrogator and without the benefit of a jury will be transported to a state prison facility for additional interrogations, beatings, torture and if found to be related to the interrogation the prospect of being executed. Executions at the Lynaugh Unit are understood to involve and supported by the US Congresss hidden written policy, which they appear to be subjecting to state control at least via unofficial comments, could involve being hung by the neck until dead, or the electric chair at high voltage, or beaten to death with a club. The method chosen depends on the Governor whom is understood to never have resinded the decision to execute anyone, but may have stalled it long enough to get more information via interrogation or to step up the date. That is it, and Congress or the President of the Governor refuse so far to discuss these policies with anyone. It is alledged that thousands of young women may be being beaten to death in jails across the US to date for petty crimes via this process. Also Congress is understood to have written laws that enable some courts to send defendant to prisons of a private or secret status even abroad as long as the defintion of their facilities is consistent with the intent to house an inmate. This process could enable our government to rid themselves of political opposition by placing defendants in prisons in other countries whom practice brutal methods of interrogation that could ultimately lead the inmate to being horrifically executed. The cost of this unwritten or hidden policy is $ 174, 000 to 230,000 per member of Congress per year, and then there are the cost of the loss of lifes, businesses and the like for their defendants. Also in 2004, the US Senate voted out it's own powers to investigate anything of a criminal nature including local cops involved in crimes and that of officials. Michael Duerksen po box 5856 Midland, tx 79704 Subject: US Congress Criminal Justice System Policy To Date Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 15:21:01 GMT ____________________________________________________________ Dismantling: is is suggested that somewhere is a nationwide military based electronically controlled setup that allows the theives to proliferate. It was set up originally by the US Congress 50 years ago or so to keep resistance down to a minimal, but now may have been compromised to the point where it now serves killers, replacers, theives and the like. Point: The first part of this commentary is about our rights as arrested persons and the history that unfolded as I began to search for the truth against the deceit that appeared to be spreading around the country in reference to the kind of things that the US Congress had enabled cops to do to us having to do with discipline and torture. After a couple of years of manipulation of the public, some of which I wrote about, the country appeared to believe that they were subject to unspoken but none the less very real Congressional laws that enabled cops to do the following things to us: 1. arrest us and take us to jail where as part of the indoctrination the arrestee could be beaten with at least ten hard licks with a paddle, anyone of which cold cause the death of the defendant. 2. Failure on the part of the arrestee to take the beating " appropriately" would result in a longer beating. 3. During questioning, the defendant would be stopped when his or her answers to questions were not deemed appropriate and then beaten again. 4. Failure on the part of the defendant to react appropriately to the interrogationally motivated beating could result in worse. 5. In addition to these beatings which would include those given for failure to adhere to the rules of the institution there would be torture. This torture could include breaking the bones in the feet and various forms of water torture. 6. Water torture would more or less depend on the Sheriff's dept or Police, but one of the methods that I heard of involved placing the defendant in cold water up to his nose when he or she failed to answer questions properly. This could also involve sinking the defendant down into the water until he or she died. When they died, and the officer would guarantee that they did, they would take the defendant out of the tank and rescusitate them. Eventually, the defendant would once again be questioned and failure to answer properly would result in another drowning, and so on and so forth until they got what they wanted, and that would be exactly what they wanted the defendant to state.....true or false. ( the problem with the logic for torturing someone to get information is that the nature of the torture is such that is might be concluded that it will get the defendant to state anything in order to survive. The goal is to avoid being tortured, and a sanctioned lie might save them, from torture that is, but not from being sent to prison. A good investigator does not rely on the use of pain to get information, but rather the observation of the defendants conduct including the signs of what is going on in his non-verbal behavior. If the investigator is capable then they should be able to also conclude that there should be evidence somewhere if in fact that the defendant is guilty, and therefore will proceed to look for it.   )  7. Court: during court it was stated by some that the defendant was taken outside the room for additional beatings if the judge and officers felt that he or she were not saying things in keeping with their previous testimony. 8. Last but not least, the judge might order the defendant to be disciplined with a paddle as part of the punishment and that this discipline could be death intensity level beatings on the bare buttocks that could be to the tune of ten or more a day for the duration of the time they were in prison assuming that he or she survived that long. Okay, this is basicly the story that I was picking up and alot of Americans appeared to believe it, and because they believed it some, perhaps quiet a few were moving out of the country. So much so, some argued that it was hurting the economy of the state of Texas. I contacted the State Bar of Texas to find out what was going on here, and when I did I asked them this question, and this question is an example of one of the items listed that local cops are alledged to be doing to people just about anywhere. Question: " Can a police officer or deputy approach a group of young people on a parking lot and hand out little slips of paper indicating that the recepient of the paper must show up at a certain place at a certain time to be hand spanked on the bare buttocks for conduct the officer consisered to be unruly?" The State Bar of Texas sent me back a response and in the letter they asked me to access their site in order to find the list of items that would correspond to my question. When I did and began to read line by line of data that appeared to plainly contradict the above story, I decided that the country might be in danger of being deceived long enough to find themselves subject to very real discipline and torture laws that members of the US Senate and House among others planned on implementing and ones that would be very much like the ones mentioned above or worse. The idea here is that in the minds of Congress, the President and others as long as people are being lead to believe that this is happening then we might as well take advantage of it. That is when I began to send this paper around. Another thing is that persons in the US Senate whom appeared to be in assocation with US Senator Harry Reid in reference to issues pertinent to the entry of Mexican cops and other immigration related matters would also appear to be men and women whom I thought that I should consider to be prone to implementing such discipline and torture laws. Next: At the bottom of this paper is a little short comment titled, " The Replicated Brain, etc..." I did not write this comment to demonstate a position on such as concept that was meant to imply that I was in favor of any such thing, but rather to explain what some people seem to believe either is or could occurr in this county via the use of what I refer to as brain device tech. It was suggested that The Replicated Brain story is so bad that if such a thing could ever happen then why would'nt the country be interested in using discipline and torture such as that described above or perhaps much worse in order to frustrate the goings on of such trouble. The problem here is that persons given to doing such things to us, would also be people whom appear to share the common position of being outside the confines of the law, and this by virtue of the fact that the government refuses to acknowledge the existence of brain device related technologies. As long as the government refuses to acknowledge the existence of brain device related technologies to carry out crimes, any crime, in such a hideous manner in some cases they say, then anyone they use brain device tech on could infact, as victims, be the only ones facing discipline and torture laws due to the fact that the users of the bad programs would also be using surveillance and other means to dispose of their victims in such a manner that would enable the abusers of the system to falsely incriminate them, and therefore we would have a country where the government punishes victims of brain device crimes....crimes committed by cops, their kids, and others, because those crimes do not officially occur if the government refuses to admit that it exist and if they refuse to admit that it exists then any crime committed with it is considered not to have occurred not matter how bizarre and harmful. The idea that our country's leadership would implement discipline and torture laws instead of exposing the criminal use of varied and very harmful brain device programs appears to indicate that they are not operating withing the confines of sanity. Prenote: Knowing your rights is not enough, especially while in the face of a government that may prove determined to replace them with oppressive laws even as we appear to be wanting to celebrate their existence. We cannot appear to get our congress or president to demonsrate an opinion in defense of rights such as he following. Instead they appear to be waiting around for us to be misled into believing things about our rights that might give them the opportunity to pervert them. Our country needs to know their rights, to undo any deviations implemented by a president and Congress from those long held convictions reflected by the US Constitution, and to prepare to fight legislatively and otherwise against intent to prevert what laws that are in our defense that still remain. It could be that we are looking at a Congress and President whom view themselves as right for the job of substituting what we hold to be true and right, and among those rights does include the rights of the arrested persons. A Little note about the process of maintaining your rights in this or any country: first in my opinion it is not enough to know your rights. At this time in our history we appear to have a congress comprised of some officials, perhaps the voting majority, whom will oppose those rights if they think you are on to them...that you are trying to hold onto them. I believe that anyone in the US Senate, for example, whom appears to vote like persons involved in the formation of policy consistent with the beliefs of US Senator Harry Reid, will eventually oppose our rights. In other words, when the time is right in their minds, and they see that we are trying to hold onto a law that enables us some protection, especially that having to do with being arrested and questioned, then perhaps they will try to dismantle those rights....rights under our noses, especially if we the consumer are not making issue out of their unpublicized voting habits. Knowing our rights without doing things that will keep them on the books is in and of itself not enough. I say US Senator Harry Reed, because the senator appears to be opening up this country to the presence of Mexican cops and officials in an unprecidented manner and that consistent with this approach to his writing of legislation is the additional laws that he and his associates in the US Senate did write to enable Mexican immigrants to get into our military and colleges. Such a person as this would in my opinion eventually try to write out rights as arrested persons out of the books among other things, and I believe that Americans need to vote Senator Reed and anyone whom votes like him out of the US Senate during the next round of elections. Personally I do not think that most Americans want Mexican cops on US Soil. I don't think that Mexican immigrants to the US want Mexican cops on US soil. I believe that it is a breech in our security, intelligence functions and economic stability. Even if if wasn't. and it is, I can't think of any reasonable officer of the law whom wants to compete for jobs with officers from Mexico. I really believe that Senator Reid and others in the US Senate want to strike down those rights of the arrested persons and I think that they want to see Americans arrested and beaten with a paddle, and interrogated via the use of beatings and torture, and if you continue to ignore them I think that they just will. Please take this seriously. Congressional members whom appear to be prone to write policy that enables Mexican cops and officials to take jobs in the country appear to be saying in effect that it is okay to have men in women in this country and that via their use of mind control related technology to reign over us whom appear to be coming from a Mexican history criminal justice history that includes the use of abject means of torture and harsh inprisonment. We as a country have tried to write laws that enable us to maintain security and liberty in this land in a reasonable fashion without the use of cruel and unusual means of discipline and also torture. They do not appear to see it that way, and what I have heard about them demonstrates that not only are they extreme in their approach but that they may tend to hate this nation. The news around West Texas is that the Mexican police officers working in places such as the city of Ft Stockton are prone to use brain device related technology to steal, rape, molest, to attempt murder and to falsely accuse people, so when I see Harry Reid and friends in the US Senate voting in favor of their presence here and also trying to make it harder to get rid of them, then I must conclude that it is only a matter of time before they also go after our rights as arrested persons and otherwise. Next: a note..... Note: I am a political advocate and human rights writer since 1998. Mostly I write crime reports and occassional commentaries related to immigration reform, criminal use of electronic surveillance, individual protection, and other. Due to the political climate as it appears to reflect the failure to discuss the following issues or to deal with them in a manner that would appear to be adequate, I decided to send out these two commentaries around the country. So far our government refuses to openly discuss the " brain device " issues noted in the papers though it has been around for 60 years or so, and this silence appears to be leaving us open to very serious problems including those related to immigrants and Mexican cops as they are entering the country with their own versions of this particular electronic surveillance and others including infared or picking it up from other Mexicans, some in the local US law enforcement market, after they get here. The government's silence and the FBI et al's resistance to investigating any criminal use of this technology to steal, rape, molest, alter, interfere with, falsely accuse, abduct and the like appears to be leaving us open to being controlled by theft rings including those possibly in the federal government. In my opinion, the situation is bad and getting worse. Anyway, the papers are being sent around the country. I am fairly well known in the US Senate and House of Representatives...also the FBI, Texas Rangers and the like. My contacts include colleges, newspapers, and also foreign media, government and the intelligence community. I hope that this helps you. Thankyou for your response. Sincerely, Michael Duerksen michaelduerksen@netzero.net Fore-comment on Rights of the Arrested:this is for anyone. Law enforcement appears to have a history of trying to keep us in the dark on our rights as arrested persons. The less we know about our rights, as far as they are concerned, the less rights we have. This includes efforts by police to imply that anyone trying to discover his or her rights must be guilty of committing a crime. This leaves us open to trouble, and the comments about the nature of the law enforcement deceit on the matter of so-called " Bush Admin" related discipline and torture laws is a very real problem, in that if the public believes that they will be disciplined in such a manner, the local cops just might do it inspite of the law. The more people believe that these things are being done, " customarily" as the cops would have us to believe, the more likely that they will do it, and the more likely that Congress might be brought to the point of actually implementing laws that reflect the alledged customs. What we are looking at here is brutality during the arrest process if the bad cops and politicians get their way, and so for the public to know their lawful rights and to express and nurture this knowledge publicly is in my opinion essential to maintaining a system free of such law enforcement violations. I have picked up tips that indicate that some members of the US Senate are quietly taking responsibility for the kinds of alledged beatings that are supposed to be going on during the arrest process in order to gain support from police organizations...you know...to get help with being re-elected. Thankyou for responding to the comments. Sincerely, Michael Duerksen michaelduerksen@netzero.net � Note: I am a political advocate and human rights writer since 1998. Mostly I write crime reports and occassional commentaries related to immigration reform, criminal use of electronic surveillance, individual protection, and other. Due to the political climate as it appears to reflect the failure to discuss the following issues or to deal with them in a manner that would appear to be adequate, I decided to send out these two commentaries around the country. So far our government refuses to openly discuss the " brain device " issues noted in the papers though it has been around for 60 years or so, and this silence appears to be leaving us open to very serious problems including those related to immigrants and Mexican cops as they are entering the country with their own versions of this particular electronic surveillance and others including infared or picking it up from other Mexicans, some in the local US law enforcement market, after they get here. The government's silence and the FBI et al's resistance to investigating any criminal use of this technology to steal, rape, molest, alter, interfere with, falsely accuse, abduct and the like appears to be leaving us open to being controlled by theft rings including those possibly in the federal government. In my opinion, the situation is bad and getting worse. Anyway, the papers are being sent around the country. I am fairly well known in the US Senate and House of Representatives...also the FBI, Texas Rangers and the like. My contacts include colleges, newspapers, and also foreign media, government and the intelligence community. I hope that this helps you. Thankyou for your response. Sincerely, Michael Duerksen michaelduerksen@netzero.net -- Forwarded message -- From: michael duerksen  Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:43 AM Subject: State Bar of Texas on Miranda Rights: note to senator To: media@rand.org Note: since the first round of sending this out, there has been a renewed stab at contradicting the entire report. There is reason to believe that the central government is actually trying to bring this country's law enforcement up to the point legislatively that we will be facing cruel and unusual punishment, most of which appears to be described in other commentaries that I wrote. Michael � Senator: perhaps you could make this an issue before a troubled country to ensure that they have rights, because local authorities in many parts of the country appear to be trying to keep citizens from believing in their options. Michael Duerksen -- Forwarded message -- From: michael duerksen  Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:23 AM Subject: Fwd: State Bar of Texas Rights of Arrested Persons To: editorinchief@dailylobo.com � � -- Forwarded message -- From: michael duerksen  Date: Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:37 PM Subject: State Bar of Texas Rights of Arrested Persons To: editor@dailytexanonline.com Subject: RE: miranda laws Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:49:12 -0500 Note: Note: for the past year or more, persons in the local law enforcement, federal agencies, and the central government appear to have been intentionally ignoring all the papers and public concern over the perception that they had implemented Bush Admin related discipline and torture laws in 2007 without consulting with their constituents, and that during the exposure of this process, Congress and the President appears to have carefully avoided reacting to any of these public concerns in order to bring their hidden law making processes up to par with the public perception that we are in big trouble with a very crooked and brutal Congress and President. In order words, while keeping silent on the perception that they had created any related laws, they appeared to be trying to use the impression as a scare tactic in order to control the public, to damage the economy and to further intensify any existing torture laws. I must assume that they intented on dumping State Bar noted Miranda Laws and otherwise including the 5th amendment and state and federal statute of limitations laws, but had to maintain the present pace of silence in order to do it. Michael Duerksen - Show Hi. You may visit http://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Free_Legal_Information&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=12075. � Thanks and best regards, � State Bar of Texas TexasBar.com Support Staff � � From: michaelduerksen@netzero.net [mailto:michaelduerksen@netzero.net] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 9:44 AM To: Webmaster Subject: miranda laws � Hello: could you please tell me what the current laws for the state are in reference to the Miranda laws? Also, if an officer confronts a person and asks them if they would mind accompanying he or she to the dept for a questioning what would be the lawful, reasonable and safe thing to do, and if you do would this negate your rights along the lines of Miranda laws?� Lastly, does an officer have the right to issue a slip of paper to a highschool girl, for example, confronted on a parking lot where the officer considered her to be involved in uncivil conduct and to ask her to visit a certain room at a certain time in a specific building where she will be beaten with a paddle or spanked?�� Sincerely, Michael Duerksen michaelduerksen@netzero.net -- Forwarded Message -- From: "michaelduerksen@netzero.com"  To: moosejuice2011@gmail.com Subject: State Bar of Texas What To Do During An Arrest: miranda Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:42:02 GMT I f Yo u Ar e Ar r e s t e d T H E S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S When are you under arrest? You are arrested when law enforcement officers take you into custody or otherwise deprive you of your freedom of movement in any significant way in order to hold you to answer for a criminal offense. You may, in fact, be under arrest even though no one has actually used the word �arrest.� What rights do you have when you are questioned by the police? 1. You have the right to remain silent. 2. If you choose to speak, anything you say can be used against you in court. 3. If you decide to answer any questions, you may stop at any time and the law requires all questioning to cease. 4. You have a right to consult with your attorney before answering any questions. You have the right to have your attorney present if you decide to answer any questions, and if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you or appointed for you by the court without cost to you before any further questions may be asked. What are your rights after you have been arrested? You have a right to know what crime or crimes with which you have been charged. You have the right to communicate by telephone with your attorney or family or friend or bondsman as soon after you are brought to the police station as practical. The police have a right to complete their booking procedures before you are allowed to use the telephone. May a law enforcement officer detain you without arresting you? If there is a reasonable suspicion that you may be involved in criminal activity, a police officer may require you to identify yourself and explain your presence at a particular time. If the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that you are armed and/or that you may be dangerous, he or she may conduct a limited pat down of your outer garments for the purpose of detecting weapons. The officer may ask you questions pursuant to an investigation. You have a constitutional right to not answer them, but if you refuse to identify yourself, the officer may have grounds to make an arrest. At the conclusion of this temporary detention, the officer must either arrest you or let you go. When may you be arrested with a warrant? A police officer may arrest you at any time if there is a warrant for your arrest or if they have knowledge that a warrant for your arrest has been issued. A police officer must show the warrant to you as soon as possible and inform you of the offense charged. When may you be arrested without a warrant? A police officer may make an arrest without a warrant only under certain limited circumstances in Texas. An officer may arrest anyone who commits an offense in the officer�s presence or within the officer�s view. An officer may arrest a person if informed by a credible person that a felony has been committed and that the offender is about to escape and there is no time to get a warrant. Examples of felonies include the more serious crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, burglary, and sale of narcotics. What force may the officer use in making an arrest? The officer may employ all reasonable and necessary force to overcome resistance in making a lawful arrest. Resisting arrest or obstructing or interfering with an officer in the performance of the officer�s duty may be a criminal offense. You could be convicted of either of these crimes, even if you were found not guilty of the crime for which you were arrested. When may you be searched? If you are arrested in your home, officers may conduct a limited search of the immediate area where you are arrested without a search warrant. They may also check the rest of the house for any accomplices. They may seize any contraband, stolen property, and/or evidence of a crime discovered in plain view in any portion of the house where the officers have a right to be. When you are arrested while driving your automobile, the officers may make a limited search of your car at that time for the purpose of discovering weapons which might be used against them. They may not make a general search of your automobile unless there is independent probable cause that the vehicle is carrying evidence of crime or contraband. If a search is requested by an officer, you are not required to give consent. You may object to a search or police procedures, but always do so respectfully and do not physically resist the officer�s actions. What procedures are usually followed when you are arrested? 1. The officer will take you to a police station, jail, or other detention facility. 2. Upon arrival at the jail or shortly thereafter, you will be afforded the opportunity to contact an attorney. 3. You will be advised generally as to the charges against you. 4. You may be required to: � participate in a lineup, � prepare a sample of your handwriting, � speak phrases associated with the crime with which you are charged, � wear certain clothes, and/or � give a sample of your hair, blood, etc. YOU SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE YOUR ATTORNEY PRESENT DURING ANY OF THE PROCEDURES BELOW. 5. You may also be required to be fingerprinted and photographed. 6. You must be taken before a magistrate (a court official that may exercise some functions of a judge) within a short time of your arrest. The magistrate will inform you of the charge filed against you and your rights. What happens to personal property you may have with you? If you are booked into a jail, the police may take money and property from you for safekeeping. They will carefully inventory your money and property and give you a copy of the inventory. At the time of your release or at the conclusion of your case, your property that was not seized as evidence in the case will be returned to you. You will be given an opportunity to sign the property list. Make certain the list includes all the items taken from you. How may you be released? You may be released on bail. This involves the posting of either cash money or a bail bond as security for your court appearance. In some cases you may be released upon a personal recognizance (your promise to appear in court when directed). When you are brought before the magistrate, you may request that the magistrate lower your bail in consideration of your ties in the community, financial resources, employment record, or other factors. How do you arrange for a lawyer? If you are not acquainted with a lawyer and have no lawyer whom you would call, you may contact the State Bar of Texas Lawyer Referral and Information Service by calling toll-free, 1-877-9TEXBAR or 800-252-9690. If you cannot afford a private lawyer, you should advise the judge of this fact at your first appearance or as soon as possible. The judge will ask you some questions to see if you are eligible for the services of an attorney at public expense. For additional copies, please contact: State Bar of Texas Public Information Department P.O. Box 12487 Austin, TX 78701 800-204-2222, ext. 1800 www.texasbar.com 35042 3/07 _House Divided Against Itself Concepts: Today in this country are individuals and groups working in favor of only their particular objectives for stealing and therefore creating ever increasing and hidden stashes of American wealth. These stashes are open to being easily damaged in my opinion and due to the perceived number of such " stashers" there is reason to believe that among other problems this placing a strain on this economy. Other groups that appear to be competing against the infrastructure of the survival of the United States also appear to be people involved in the damage, replication, theft and replacement of people's mind. This house divided against itself play seems to guarantee that the day will come when there is really no one to defend his or her property let alone the country as a whole. These theft rings are like locusts on our path, and they are trying to suck up anything they can get their hands on...stuff that will go into their vulnerable stashes. The operator used the machine to replicate the target's brain, and then to slip it off in invisible form to a safe place to study. He studied the memories and then placed the brain inside the skull of an animal. This brain was virtually the same as that of the original person, and infact thought that it was the same person, so there were emotional issues to deal with. The operator replicator his own brain and reduced the size to that of an orange, and all of this occurred in the following manner. The operator moved some " invisible " substance via the air, surrounded and sunk the stuff down into the brain of the target, then he allowed it to mimic every cell in the brain. Once the replicated version was complete in about 15 seconds or less, then he began to the replicant out of the skull and back to himself where he attached the invisible replicant onto his own brain. He thought about turning the original brain of the person invisible and removing it and leaving the replicant. Instead he would attach a reduced size of his own replicated brain in invisible form to the target to keep things in tow. The invisible, replicated brain of the operator would be sunk into the head of the target and attached. This conscious mirror of the operator would keep things under control. ( there was this guy once, and he was taking a nap. While he was sleeping, some cretans with machines came along and replicated his whole body and removed the perfect replication away from the original and left it to stand in the middle of the room. The replicant thought he was the original and the original got up to cross the room and in so did begin to confront unknowingly the replicant. When he did, the worried replicant made a dash to jump into his own body, but could not. So with all the memories intact of whom he thought he was and realizing that he was the victim of the world of replication he went off to save himself. This left the original person with the task of facing a world comprised of replications of himself, most of whom could not " materialize " and therefore were left to struggle. )  The target, realizing that he had another person's brain inside of him did get up and began to bounce up and down on his feet lightly in order to shake the other person's reduced brain out of himself. This he concluded was not hard to do, but the brain might have a gyroscope like stationing device that allowed it to remain floating in the right place should the target fail to move away. If the subject did move away a foot or two or less, then all he had to do was to swing his arm or a stick through the space where he thought that the brain might be and so dispatch it. The problem for the target was, did the operator turn the reduced and invisible replicated brain into one of his organs, so that the right kidney or left and right for example might be replaced with both hemispheres of the operator's brain. If so it could not be shook out. The machine operator decided to reduce his or another person's brain and attach it to a wild animal such as a bear, so he did, and this gave the bear access to better than working information about the world. The bear decided that he would make a better politician than a bear. The operator also gave the bear access to simplified programs that would enable the bear to turn invisible or visible at will, to reduce or enlarge his size, to mutate himself into the shape of a person, etc. It is said, that on the college campuses there are brain theft rings whom prowl libraries and other places in small groups and do surround their targets and try repeatedly to replicate their brains. If they succeed they take the invisible brain home with them and begin to play havoc with the replicated and fully, if not perfect droid of themselves where the replicated version will be subjected to intense abuse, torture and rape. Some of the victims of these groups are real people....students they trapped in less noticeable parts of the campus. The 10 year old of a couple had picked up soe powerful machine programs floating around the school, and decided that he didn't need his parents anymore. His friend Monroe has dispatched his parents recently and replaced them with droid replicants of the same and found that the original unconscious bodies made fine tentacles ( invisible forms of human, animal or both flesh molded into Octupus like grasping tubes. ) to use for raping his teacher. He could attach replicated or original eyes, nose, parts of the brain and other stuff from the animal and human world to them in invisible form all attached to his own brain and run the house. The replicated versions of his parents made all the PTA meetings, and his allowances were much bigger....like a 100,000 a year or more. Off Monroe went to school each morning with tentacles in tow. What a life....so the couple's ten year old began to study his parents closely in order to get a fix on how it was done; that is the business of facing the world as professionals, his dad the doctor, his mom the teacher. They saw their son laying on the carpet sometimes at night going on medical journals but they didn't think to suspect that their end was near, and it was. One night the son, turned the parents unconscious, then invisible, then altered their shape and reduced them to servitude; the servitude of tentacles. Monroe used his existing programs to break into the home of an FBI agent, and when he had finished he was able to walk away with programs that would enable him to become a CIA man or President of the United States....or a bear. Tentacles: the machine operator used a program to turn animal and/or human flesh into an octupus shaped tentacle, and he found that this could be done of varying degrees...perhaps a mile in length with the addition of eyes, suckers, hands, brains and the like. There was fear that persons creating such tentacles for sale might be adding a program that would compromise the well being of the user. This might involve replacing the human user with the tentacle, which would be converted into a copy of the person while the person would be converted into a copy of the tentacle against their will. The Homeless as house theives. Prison Industry and excons in the police job market and what this means to the home theft and replacement business. There appears to be a brain device related house and family stealing business amongst the homeless. Sincerely, Michael Duerksen ____________________________