Thread:Comments:US House of Representatives impeaches President Trump/Controversion on the Subject of Impeachment/reply

Some things to keep in mind about covering the holding-back-articles story:
 * It would be a separate article. A Wikinews article is a snapshot in time:  each one covers a specific event, which must be current at the time the article is published, and is limited to that particular event at that time.  For a different specific event, or a significantly later development related to the earlier event, a new article is needed.  Once an article is published, substantive changes to it are only allowed for another 24 hours.  Eventually, all the articles in our archives are fully protected; but we don't fully protect at article until we remove it from the list of most-recently-published on the main page, and we keep at least ten articles on the main page so people can see a representative sample of our work.
 * Each article starts with a focal event, around which it is built. The focal event has to have three properties, which collectively we call newsworthiness: it must be specific, relevant, and fresh.  Relevance isn't a problem in this case.  If you can't pin down on what day it happened, it's not specific.  If the day you pin it down to isn't either today, yesterday, or maybe the day before yesterday, it's probably not fresh.  If it happened the day before yesterday, that could make it very difficult for us to meet our deadline, because it's not enough for the event to be fresh when the article is written; it has to still be fresh when the article is published: that means it has to be fully written and pass a rigorous review by an authorized volunteer reviewer.  This has been compared to taking a Wikipedia article all the way from an initial concept to  status in one or two days.
 * I usually recommend reading first Pillars of writing (a short overview of what we do here), then Writing an article (a tutorial on writing one's first article here).