Thread:Comments:US Senate votes to repeal authorizations of use of force against Iraq/ The Repeal of Use of Force Authorizations - A Victory for Iraq's Sovereignty/reply

I have to disagree. This was a huge disgrace to the reputation of our country. Iraq has no soviergnity, it is not a real nation. It's something that British randomly made up in 1922. It is no more a nation than transnistra or any of those puppets. An authorization to fight terrorism does, indeed, cause sufferring for terrorists, yes. That's a good thing. Iraq's future should indeed be shaped by it's own people, not only by the people got ahold of a gun. An authorization to use force does not a start a conflict, a conflict starts and therefore authorization is given. The presence of military forces has hindered Iraq's ability to have true autonomy. True autonomy would be disasterous, as the Iraqi military is too weak. The country would (and slowly is) being taken over be terrorists. The responsibility for the instability lies on Saddam Hussein lap mostly. As well, I would probably blame Iran and Russia for giving weapons to terrorists, and maybe Obama for withdrawing from Iraq. You can not have respect and balance with terrorists. Self-goverence is (unfortunately) winding up in a "might makes right" disaster in Iraq. We need to revert it, not expand it. International cooperation should focus first on having the country not in terrorism/anarchy and then worry about the rest later. It only only a victory for the (small) part of the Iraqi people who are terrorists. It is irreponsible to allow this to go on. Side Note:Did you use an LLM to write this?