User:80.191.58.2/A soft power, Noopolitik approach

June 06, 2006 A soft power, Noopolitik approach Reflected in President Ahmadi-Nedjad's letter to President Bush By Mohammad Ganjidoost*

The letter of President Ahmadi-Nedjad to President Bush its wide range of topics on various dimensions deserves detailed and probably long discussions by the people of knowledge and experience in related fields. However, the purpose of this writing is a short intervention for an appropriate contribution to ring the bell that the noopolitik is on its dawn and the people of values should not loose the opportunity. Many scholars of politics and international relations are of the view that the world has already entered the new era, one name for which is the "information age", and the international relations is experiencing a new paradigm, in conformity with this new world atmosphere. This new paradigm introduced, in a trinity of conceptuality and emphasize, as cyberpolitik, infopolitik or noopoltik, based on the corresponding realms of cyberspace, infosphere and noosphere, has won the superiority over realpolitik(power politics), liberalism or liberal internationalism, no doubt through the Information and Communications Technology(ICT) as its vehicle. In keeping with the point that the root word noos refers to the mind, noopolitik means having a systematic ability to conduct foreign interactions in knowledge-related terms. Moreover, the rise of soft power makes noopolitik feasible. Whereas realpolitik often aims at coercion through the exercise of hard power, whose essence is military, noopolitik aims at attracting, persuading, and enjoining with soft power, whose essence is nonmilitary, based on mindfulness and understanding. The observation in this article is that, the letter of President Ahmadi-Nedjad to President Bush, with or without his notice to the forces of change in the age of Information Revolution, has triggered socio-political waves that can best represent the ongoing expansion of the knowledge environment towards the "noosphere", a world prevailed by knowledge, learning, dialogue and public understanding, making "noopolitik" dominant paradigm of the twenty first century. Here is some evidential reasoning for this observation: 1-	The very form of communication, "a letter", not necessarily, "a diplomatic letter or a note, etc.", or even as referred to by some, "the unorthodox letter" is unprecedented or undefined in the existing frameworks of "realpolitik based international relations". President Bush, himself can not put it into any known or practiced category, at least on the side of the United States, but calling it "interesting", and describing it by the number of its pages "18-paged letter", indicating that he is facing a new phenomenon, or finding himself in a new political atmosphere! Thus, the letter does not follow the "power politics practiced diplomatic protocol". 2-	In a report of this letter in Carnegie website, the readers are referred to an article by George Perkovich under the caption, "Giving Justice its due"; criticizing President Bush for his negligence of the creeds of the US. In part of the article it reads, "Unfortunately, the elision of the notion of justice from the president's speech matches its elision from his foreign policy, with the result that in recent years, U.S. diplomacy – public and private – has been limping along on one leg and stumbling ". Inference from Dr. AhmadiNedjad's letter to make references to such articles is an indication that the letter has caused contemplation on US values, instead triggering arrogant references to the US capacities of raw power politik. Moreover, Mr. Perkovich suggests that the U.S. should not ignore challenge by Mr. Ahmadinejad on a contest over whether the positions he and Iran pursue are more just than those of the Bush Administration, but rather take it head on. He calls in the Foreign Affairs article for President Bush to address "growing international demands for justice to complement the freedom doctrine". Therefore, we can induce that Dr. AhmadiNedjad's letter has put the forgotten values back on the political table and made them new agendas for diplomacy and this is justifiable in noopolitik, where "right makes the might" and not in power politics, where "might makes the right". 3-	Furthermore, the letter has triggered an intervention by the NGOs, the ones concerned about the practice of justice, and particularly those of churches and religious circles. Such NGO's wish for the issues related to human destiny to be released from the confines of the "no entrance, classical diplomatic zone" and be played before the eyes of people of the world in a collaborative "positive-sum political game", and in the interest of the people of the world all over. This again is of an aspect associated with the noopolitik paradigm which is supposed to umbrella the networked value-based world of knowledge, understanding and cooperating, lead eventually, in large parts of it, by the NGO's very much willing to collaborate with the Governments on these very lines. 4-	Let us Recall that, at least some aspects of "soft power" is to achieve desired outcomes through reliance on norms and values and to give in to sharing with others in both national and transnational scales so as to win through attraction rather than coercion. As in the words of Nye, soft power "works by convincing others to follow or getting them to agree to norms and institutions that produce the desired behavior. Soft power can rest on the appeal of one's ideas or the ability to set the agenda in ways that shape the preferences of others". One, on the basis of these descriptions, may conclude that soft power politics is well reflected and highlighted in the content of the letter of President AhmadiNedjad. The very content of the letter, the points it is trying to make is very much mind provoker in the direction of setting new agendas for international dialogue. "Regardless of Ahmadinejad's intentions, many regard the letter favorably. The Peninsula, a Qatari news site, sees it as "a taboo-breaking initiative … an opening—even if only slim—for the longtime foes to engage in a dialogue." Arab News of Saudi Arabia hails it as "remarkable and encouraging … an unexpected diplomatic opening." Germany's Der Spiegel calls it "a deft move for Ahmadinejad's image in the Middle East." Many, after all, agree with his characterization of Israel and of the contradiction between Bush's principles and actions". The direct and indirect reactions and responses, and even various forms of propagandas around it may be interpreted in the same context. After all, in all such activities, one way or the other, particular goals are to be achieved by soft power means. Even those who flash back to challenge the internal situation of Iran, make reference to the very content of the letter and are therefore using a soft power political tactic which is in fact well interpretable in noopolitk. 5-	The very media coverage of this letter and the reactions to it, which is multiplied by manifold, in any form: positively confirming or negatively criticizing, anxiously and politely analyzing it or angrily and impolitely reacting to it; availing it as an opportunity to introduce new issues of human needs and interests or showing a sense of humor or even unjustly ridiculing it, all are manifestation of the expanding realm of noosphere, both in content and volume. It would be interesting to compare statistically the public, or more precisely, elite participation with regard to this letter with any similar dialogue between any two heads of states, particularly with the ones taking place in the modern classical diplomacy era of the twenty's century, when the vast use of internet had not facilitated living in the noosphere and playing the noopolitik. 6-	No matter what the reaction of President Bush or others will be, this letter will remain as a document of civil correspondence addressed to the appropriate world through President Bush; and this is well public diplomacy which may not have necessarily immediate result, especially when power politics makes its last noisy moves out. It has created a turning point or a benchmark in diplomacy, to advise Presidents to come out of the confines of the so called "classical diplomatic correspondence" and enter into "civil correspondence". As Fred Kaplan puts it, " In short, it provides a perfect opportunity for Bush to do what he should have been doing for the last few years—to lay out what America stands for, what we have in common with Muslim nations, and how our differences can be tolerated or settled without conflict. In fact, civil correspondence with the Iranian president could be touted as a sign of Bush's good intentions and his desire for diplomacy.

To summarize, this article's purpose is only to touch on a few points to support that the idea that noopolitik, as a suitable paradigm for the information age, is already flourishing and "noo-diplomacy", a diplomacy based on values, norms, knowledge and common understanding and collaboration as its means is prevailing the modern classic diplomacy, the tools for which, in a single phrase, was arm twisting behind the curtains in the absence of peoples. The letter of Dr. AhmadiNedjad to his American counterpart, regardless of how it may be interpreted, is a case well in conformity with the new era of Information Revolution and the importance of soft power politics. Although, according to Josef Joffe, "this does not mean that hard power and realpolitik are obsolete, or even in abeyance", nevertheless, understanding the merit of the new comer makes the undesirable old version to leave the scene faster.

Mohammad Ganjidoost, June 6, 2006 mganjidoost@yahoo.com