User:Amgine/rage

The public will never know why you selected to target some people and not others, or even who you did not choose to report on, unless you release the documents publicly. Some of your partners have already garnered an assumption of bad faith (e.g. CBC, which chose to name-and-shame the spouse of a Liberal Party senator days before the Liberal Party leadership convention, the only name released so far.)

There's no reason to assume you are shaking down the wealthy to selectively suppress coverage. Nor the reverse.

Oh, and btw, thank you for the put-down. "this is not easy data to understand" really means "we're smarter than you, because we can." Just to remind you, there are more than 4.2 million articles, upwards of 14 million files/pages/elements in the English Wikipedia - entirely constructed and maintained by random netizens - and that's just one of more than 600 wikis maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation. I think you underestimate the public.

Or overestimate what you're doing.

re Why We Are Not Turning Over the Offshore Files to Government Agencies (or anyone else.)