User:Lazyquasar~enwikinews

Hi All,

I am a Wikiversity Participant. My current activities are sketched at my Wikiversity Portal Page temporarily lodged at Wikibooks. I check my other wiki user pages occasionally but if you need confidence I will get a message within a few days, please ask questions regarding engineering school at the help desk. Personal messages of course should go on my discussion page.

Articles I am working on:

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/Talk:Investigation_of_Allegations_that_Wikimedia_Foundation_has_Conflicts_of_Interest_Spark_Interest_in_Publishing_Transparent_Books

Fair Disclosure:
 * I am a founding member of the greenSpace faction driven away from Wikipedia.com as it transitioned to a .org and the founder proceeded to establish a dominated dot.org to pursue his philanthropic encyclopedia goals. I currently have no solid information regarding wikicities.com only rumor and innuendo ... however a lot of smoke to inhale, blow away or document for real fire fighters with time for pre-emptive or preventative measures and education when they hear from private/black/noforn/god/sovereign/owner nullspace.


 * I attempted to place an Amazon affiliate link on my Wikiverisity Participant Grid Portal ... PGP is it Pretty Good Privacy or Pretty Good Portal or Participant Grid Portal ... PPPGGGPPP or -(P^3)(i^2)(G) ... hmmm. That is not going work.

Anyway, it seems to me, I read the news on plant matter or via electromagnetic radiation far more often than I consult a corresponding encyclopedia, at least in recent years (when I am not helping Wikipedia achieve critical mass). Therefore the graph below obviously shows we (Wikinews) have a long way to go to achieve Wikipedia's level of distinguished accomplishment by providing a valuable global news service direct to all consumers for valuable repackaging and sale to premium customers.



I guess we do not have javascript access. Simply go to www.alexa.com and compare Wikinews.org with Wikipedia.org and you will see what I mean. BTW: Might be an interesting AI project to setup a few genetic algorythms and let the users/bots have revert wars on the tweaks with a defined governing ontological distinction to make final judgement ... perhaps a weighted meritocratic voting on calculation probability and error tracking methods could retain intelligent design with machine rapidity in incremental improvement accrual.