User talk:65.51.209.124

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site's working and will be reverted quickly. , welcome to Wikinews! Please refrain from using content pages for testing. Here are a few good links for newcomers on how to edit Wikinews:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 15:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how an article should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * And of course, stories need writing!

Commenting in Commentary
Dragonfrie, comments are not trolling and should not have been reverted --- read the banner --65.51.209.124 (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I wouldn't consider your comments trolling yet, although I could certainly see them going that way. In any case, you may well accuse us of "navel gazing", but we're well within our remit to write articles about the Foundation and related activities. Do you think the New York Times never writes about itself? Fox News doesn't report on Rupert Murdoch in its typically fair and balanced manner? If Wikimedia does something newsworthy (and both of the articles you've declared navel gazing have been covered in other media), then we'll report on it. Chris Mann (Say hi!|Stalk me!) 23:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * So people can scream "death to Israel" and other racist rants and all kinds of crazy shit, and that's fine. But if you suggest that Wikinews is a little pre-occupied with Wikimedia, then you're a Troll and your comments first get deleted by one administrator and then another administrator comes and threatens you. Wow! Someone's a bit sensitive!
 * And Mr. Mann, Fox News doesn't ever have days were 30% of its coverage is about Rupert Murdoch, News Corp. and Twentieth Century Fox. Nor does CNN devote that much time to Warner Bros. and Ted Turner.--65.51.209.124 (talk) 13:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't think those comments constituted trolling, i've seen much worse rants/garbage being put up on comments pages that were never removed. I feel we should only be removing comments that are blatantly offensive and/or random nonsense; in this case, the user was expressing his opinion, and although it could have been perceived as slightly inflammatory, it certainly wasn't "trolling" enough to merit removal. Tempodivalse [talk]  13:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)