User talk:91.141.118.34

Have you got any proof of your claims on the scientology article. If not I will have to move it somewhere else. I value your contribution but I would really like some proof that this happened. Also, it seems a bit biased. However, to keep in line with the 3RR I will try not to delete it. I suggest moving it to the comments section as proof is really required as what you said is quite controversial and you are an anonymous user. When I removed it I stated on the talk page of the article that I believe it would be nice. Also please do not post a note in the article saying "do not delete this" or similar. I value your response and would hope for you to respond at my talk page --Anonymous101 Talk RfA 17:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikinews pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Vienna
It isn't deleted, It was moved to the Colabariton page, because of some concerns about emotive language and sourcing. It's not personal, but extrodinary claims need exceptional proof :) ShakespeareFan00 20:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)