User talk:Carlosar~enwikinews

Hi,

thanks for working on so many articles. Please try to get some of them into the review stage, otherwise they might be lingering in development for too long. One issue with most of the pages you worked on: It would be helpful if you could cite the sources at the bottom more extensively, e.g. for a Reuters story, cite the title of the story and the date along with the link to the online copy. This is important because these websites take down their stories after a while, and without a headline and date, it becomes almost impossible to track them down.--Eloquence 03:14, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. I will do that. I have put some empty articles because I wanted to stimulate new users. --carlosar Nov 16 23:16:26 UTC 2004

Topic pages
I created a section for "topic pages" on the main page and added one for MST/Brazil, if you'd like to start collecting all of thosearticles together. 68.85.91.55 01:31, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

finished edits on your article
Hey. I rewrote some more of your article. I hope I could help. I had never heard of the MST before, so was curious. Thanks for taking the time to get me some more information. jkrusky 03:07, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Help on an article
Carlosar, I could use your help on South American Community of Nations announced at Third South American Summit. This could be a long piece, but it begins to lose depth around "SACN is a more ambitious union than the previous Andean Community and Mercosur." 119 20:31, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I will take a look.--Carlosar 02:15, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please explain your comments re Honduran article?--Squeakfox 14:49, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Just name your references. That is all. -- Carlosar 03:47, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Sorry if I stomped on your edits to the FARC article.
I think I might have wiped out some of your references in your FARC article about Granda getting captured. I think I fixed it correctly, but if not, sorry about that. No harm intended. Pingswept 03:02, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok :) -- Carlosar 03:46, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Please do not blank pages
Thanks for taking an active interest in maintianing quality in Wikinews. I have been reverting some of your past edits. You have been blanking pages (erasing all content and saving the no-content page). This is not accepted Wikinews convention. In the future, if you do not like a page and think it should be removed, please list it here: WN:DR. -- Davodd | Talk 05:33, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you. -- Carlosar 09:01, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The stories were: Black Box Voting investigates allegations of election fraud in U.S. and Equifax claims '14 percent savings' with Windows Server over Linux. I unblanked them and listed both on WN:DR. -- Davodd | Talk 15:54, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I have deleted those pages because they were at the Deletion Request page. Those pages were voted as deleted(case I did no mistake). The Deletion Request page was abandoned and too heavy at that time, so I cleanned it a little, deleting old articles. Next time I will do as you suggest. Thanks. -- Carlosar 02:57, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I moved a page you were working on
I moved FARC-evidences to your personal notebook at User:Carlosar/FARC-evidences since it was a list of personal notes and wasn't a story unto itself. -- Davodd | Talk 15:54, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Maybe the page should be part of the Talk page. I think it would be more appropriate since I will not be working with this subject forever. -- Carlosar
 * If you want this on a talk page, you can cut and paste the content there. When you want your notebook page deleted, just type on the page to alert an administrator. -- Davodd | Talk 01:37, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks.--Carlosar 02:53, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * What do we do when a Talk Page becomes big? The browser cannot support a very big page.--Carlosar 02:53, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Reorganized South America and Central America
Hi! Since you frequently write articles about South America and Central America, I wanted to let you know that I've reorganized the way the pages work a bit. Until there are more editors working from those countries, there's only one place for latest news for those countries, in addition to the main homepage latest news &mdash; South America/Latest News. By adding news to that page, you get the news listed on all the category pages for all the countries in South America, and the South America page as well (though sometimes the cache needs purging). I've been following the guideline of "7 days or 7 articles, whichever is greater" per category. So "Politics and conflicts" on that page would list either the last seven days worth events, or if there isn't seven days worth of events then the last 7 links. Easy to remember, I hope.

Anyway, please take a look and let me know what you think. I've also added Central America and Central America/Latest News (which gets included in the same way). -- IlyaHaykinson 10:22, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * It is a good idea. I will try to understand how it works.Thanks. -- Carlosar 10:45, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Cool! For editing the actual news, don't edit the template &mdash; edit South America/Latest News instead. -- IlyaHaykinson 10:48, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Could you please show me how it works with a example? Move some page to there. I have added an article but I am not sure if I did it right. -- Carlosar 10:50, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Just look at the contents of the South America/Latest News page. The '|Blah= are sections, and the content underneath is where you'd add stories. -- IlyaHaykinson 11:24, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I think you are still misunderstanding the correct place to add stories &mdash; on the South America page there is an [ edit ] link at the bottom right which should take you to South America/Latest news where you can add the * Jan. 17: link to story . I've just added Colombia releases official notice in response to Venezuela there so you can see what it looks like. Does this make sense? -- IlyaHaykinson 00:48, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, I was a little confused. I think I know how it works now. Thanks. -- Carlosar 01:02, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Lula article from Jan. 20
Re: this article

Hmm, I'd take out the extra information in that graf, since it doesn't have bearing on Lula's relationship with Castro. In fact, it'd probably be a good idea to take it out of this article for now and save it for another article, one more focused on Lula's relationship with the press and/or civil liberties.

BTW, thanks for your continuing coverage of South America. We very rarely get to hear news about your part of the world in the United States.
 * Thank you. I agree with about the article. We could write another more detailed one.
 * What do you think about this article? Is it finished? Does it have some problem? Is the extra information too big? -- Carlosar 01:33, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Changed your POV Headline - "Bush stands against tyranies"
Your move to a new headline was POV since it took a side. I changed it to a neutral headline. -- Davodd | Talk 11:31, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

hey, re: WSF
I have this idea, where by articles from the same event should all be in the same article, and would like to try it out with WSF articles. I'm going to move the main article to 2005 World Social Forum, and then create within that a subsection called 2005 World Social Forum, which i will link to from the main page as The World Social Forum kicks off in Porto Alegre. Then i will write another section below that which is a summary of the first day. If you have strong objections to this experiment please feel free to revert it back into seperate articels; after all we are in beta, so we can still experiment with different ways of doing things. ~
 * You could write a separate article describing the event across the days. This article would not have a specific date. There is a problem when you think changing the original article 2005 World Social Forum in Porto Alegre; the problem is nobody will see it. The most of people read the article once and they don't return to that article again. Also, if we start doing a lot of changes in an article, the people will not have too much trust in that article (that is what I think). So I think we should write a separate article and the people must be warned that the article is going to change and that it is a dynamic coverup of an event. -- Carlosar 23:47, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey, i dont think i explained what i was doing very well. Sorry. I'll try again. Ok, under my proposal, the articles would be exactly the same as they are normaly. The text would be exactly the same, and all that would be different would be that they have a different namespace. Instead of [en.wikinews.org/wiki/foobar] it would be [en.wikinews.org/wiki/foo#bar]. It would be linked to from the mainpage in exactly the same way as it is normaly (ie. each new article would get a new link from the mainpage. Unless you click view source, you wouldnt know it was any different. Now i'll explain the advantages.


 * With certain titles of events that regularly reoccur such as American soldiers being killed in Iraq, Palistinian suicide bombings, Israeli incursions into the west bank, Sharks eating people off the south Austrlaian coast, Crocs eating tourists in Kakadu etc. etc. we will quickly run out of Namespace. There can only ever be one article called Croc eats tourist in Kakadu. That means the next time the same thing happens we will have to come up with a different title. Slowly the titles will get longer and longer and less like headlines. In three years from now it will have to be croc eats a bavarian tourist in Kakadu National Park, 250 kms from Darwin. Then in 6 years when a croc eats another german tourist in Kakadu (it happens far more often than you may think) it will have to be Croc eats a bavarian tourist named Jens in Kakadu National Park, in the Northern Teritory of Australia, 250 kms from Darwin. And as time goes on the Headline will get longer and longer and less and less like a headline, simply cause all the good headlines have all ready been taken. Now with my Idea, we seperate the idea of namespace (the actual URL of the story) and the headline. The headline would be the section heading (note: this is an or in wikimarkup thats two equal signs ==foo==, any other heading (like references or whatever) we'd use or three equal signs ===foo=== ). So the headline could still be Croc eats tourist in Kakadu even though the URL was longer.
 * With events like the WSF it will be an awesome tool for researchers (wikipedians included) because it would colate all the articles about one event together, so that one could see the changes over time. Also, as a general rule once a new section (article) is added the articles above would not be allowed to be edited (except for typos and perhaps a special updates subsection).
 * It would make things easier to organise and search through for researchers and wikinews editors.
 * It would be easy for someone who read the 3rd article in a set, to become intersted in the content and go back and look at the previous articles for further background.
 * NB: linking to [en.wikinews.org/wiki/WSF 2005#3rd day of WSF wraps up] will take you to the specific section/article rather than the top of the WSF page.
 * I'm going to leave the WSF articles as they are, but im going to move them all to my user pages to make a mock up of my proposal. paz y amor.

The bellman 11:49, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I think we should call "2005 World Social Forum in Porto Alegre" instead of just "2005 World Social Forum" because there is the another Forum in Davos. -- Carlosar 23:49, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The meeting in davos is the World Ecconomic Forum (not social forum).The bellman 11:49, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * So if there is no chance of people getting confused about it, I see no problem just calling of Social Forum. -- Carlosar 20:36, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

good work


For all the good work on Brazillian articles which you have been doing, i here by award you the wikinews lembranca, to bring you good luck on all your future edits. The bellman 04:31, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Great impovements on American Indian Movement protests against Professor Ward Churchill
Just wanted to say - great job on the article! good solution to the problem. - Amgine 19:15, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Zapatero article
Hi. I have just noticed that the Zapatero article here looks quite similar in strucutre and vocaburary to an article here. I am wondering what to do about it.. and thought to ask your opinion first. Tomos
 * They are similar probably because they are a translation of the same source: El Periodico, Barcelona.

Anyway you are right. The article is not so good. I did some changes so the article can be published. What do you think now? However I recognize this article maybe is a small mistake. What I am learning in Wikinews is that the purpose is writing a story based and supported by a lot of sources(with the exception a very few particular cases when you have to use just one source, maybe). -- Carlosar 02:05, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply. I have to admit that I am no expert on U.S. copyright (which is what we have to consider), but if the article was a verbatim translation of a copyrighted article in another language without permission, I am relatively sure that we should request it for deletion. Exclusive rights of the copyright holder includes creation of derivative work, and the term is defined at the beginning part of the law  and it says translation is among derivative works.

What if there is some modification? I don't know.. Fair use provision of the U.S. copyright law is often interpreted (in court) to mean that more new values you add to the work, and change to purposes of the work, more likely your use is to qualify as a fair use. (The term for this is "transformative use.") So if you change the work enough, then it will become fair use, and if you change further, the work will become an original work. To me, creating an English version of a news story otherwise unavailable for the English-speaking general public sounds like already enough of a transformation. But the text of the copyright law says otherwise. So I feel like I'm not able to make a good judgment. :-(

Tomos 02:42, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thank you also your quick action to resolve even the potential problem. It looks very different from the initial article. Again, it is my non-professional opinion... If anything, we can delete past revisions only and keep the current one.
 * Yes, keep this one since it has no copyright issues.

Tomos 02:46, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Actually I think I previously did a mistake when I translated the Spanish article. It will not happen again. I appreciated you warnning about this issue. Thank you. Carlosar 13:19, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * I requested deletion of past revisions. Let's see what others would think. Again, thank you for your opinions and information. Besides, like other people above, I as a reader also enjoy your contributions. Thank you for many articles and edits. :) Tomos 21:32, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Guess what? I, too, am trying out a South America template system...
And I'd love to hear feed back from you about it. It is located at South America/Temp, and should be a little easier to edit than the current setup.

Hope you can take a moment to look at it. - talk/Amgine 19:49, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Okay, Carlosar, I will add that to the South America page as soon as I have a moment. - Amgine 16:14, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Have completed updating South America, have added the countries covered to a footer, added a regional navigation bar. Need to update with latest news from the past day... - Amgine 20:19, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Editing question
Could you take a look at American nun murdered in Brazil? I had a question on the third paragraph. Otherwise, it looks good. MikeEdwards 16:48, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, I made the necessary changes. Looks good!MikeEdwards 19:39, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Spanish Interwiki
Hi, Carlos. I've checked some news here and some of them are translations of Spanish Wikinews. Good work! Would you please do me a favor: to put the English interwikis on the Spanish articles. Thanks a lot. Julián Ortega 16:13, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Bylines/dates
Just a quick note about using bylines (which have both date and location) - the location is actually where the reporter who filed the story is. With big news organisations that's often where the story happened, with reporters writing news first-hand. However, as we're tending to re-write stories from elsewhere, we should use the July 29, 2005 template, if we're not actually located where the story happened. Something like just 'BRAZIL' in the byline is fine though of course when you're doing a Brazil story.

The other thing was just to say keep an eye on the UTC time - we start new days on Latest news at midnight UTC, which is about 9pm your time I guess. So if you're finish writing a story after then, be sure to put it on the new UTC day's article page, or it could be 'lost' on yesterday's news! Dan100 (Talk) 12:02, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * I've replied on my talk page Dan100 (Talk) 11:13, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Portuguese Wikinews set up
Hi Carlosar,

the Portuguese Wikinews is now set up at http://pt.wikinews.org. You may want to start by translating some key policies from the English version. Good luck with the project!--Eloquence 02:29, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sgrena story
Thanks for looking at the Sgrena story. I added a section with the military side of the story. &mdash; DV 22:20, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Monobook.css on pt.wikinews
You left a message a couple of days ago for me, regarding difficulties on pt. Sorry I wasn't around the past couple days; I was on my boat, and getting online is only occasionally possible. It seems you've resolved the issues, however, as the icon pngs are showing up now on pt.wikinews for me. - Amgine 05:26, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you very much anyway, since you looked for the problem.

Cuban "propaganda"
I'm machine translating that text now. Can you explain what issues you have with the text? - Amgine 05:13, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

There is no reference. The text is not signed by anyone known in Spanish Wikinews. Is it vandalism? I am afraid of doing something wrong.
 * I'm looking into it now. - Amgine 05:18, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I am in IRC.--Carlosar 05:20, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Partido de Lula habría recibido dinero de las FARC
Sir/Madam,

I would like to encourage you to translate such an excellent article into English. No pressure.. and if you don't have time, others can do it (I can help some) but I just thought I'd encourage you to do so, since you've written something so detailed and throrough. Zantastik 04:37, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sorry! I was too slow there;) Thank you for your wonderful contribution! Zantastik 04:40, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

New new date stamp on Main Page!
It wasn't there moments ago! I forgot how to do it... edw 03:06, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

FARC money to PT
Would you mind if I proof read this. I think it should go as lead article.

Warning, you may not appreciate some of my grammer revisions. edw 21:46, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * I do have to leave for 1 1/2 hours. On return I can get to it, so I am sorry I made the suggestion just before I must depart. I will check it irregardless when I return.
 * edw 21:56, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok --Carlosar 22:00, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure you want my opinion.
I believe both your articles on this topic to be "attack articles", that is they are biased against the PT. For example, although the article is about Abin, you include the logo of the FARC. And in your previous article you used strong declarative sentences (so-and-so did this) in this article you use diffident sentences (so-and-so has stated documents may be incorrect.) In comparing the articles, briefly, I do not feel either is particularly neutral or balanced. I have not done an in-depth fact checking of the article, but am commenting on the over-all article tone or angle.

Also, on my machine the table much too wide, and uses non-relative settings. - Amgine 22:11, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Brazil builds South America-Arab World axis
In much of North America, using the term "Axis" is extremely pejorative, and strongly suggests the organization is evil. Do you think a better choice might be "Brazil builds South America-Arab World relationships" or "Brazil builds South America-Arab World league"? - Amgine 02:33, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Drafts
Please don't clutter the main article namespace with chaff. You have a user namespace. Please use it. I've moved Draft to User:Carlosar/Sandbox. Uncle G 12:01, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry.

Bin Laden Islam article

 * Good Work on the bin laden islam article Paulrevere2005 02:06, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

PT/FARC
I worked on the grammer and punctuation. I made no attempt to change content, only make it more readable for english readers. I apolgize in advance if any chages I made alter your meaning in the article. You present a very balanced piece here!

Were the tables hard? or did they go fairly easy after getting the knack for it.... edw 01:07, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * I see you are writing a follow up article to your earlier story. I scanned the first paragraph and note how much well rendered it is from your earlier work. Thanks for keeping us up to date. -edw 22:40, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Categories
This message is being given to several people, so please forgive the formality.

I've created a list of categories that must be included in ALL articles to ensure the DPL system works correctly. Adding the revlevent categories from this list will ensure complete site-wide relevent article listing. It is located at User:CGorman/Categories and you can easily cut & paste out of it. I urge frequent writers to bookmark this page to help save themselves time with categorization. Thanks for your attention. → CGorman (Talk)  19:40, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

legal issues
Actually, there is a legal problem with your article, if it is in great part a translation of the Oil-for-Food Program article on Wikipedia. Wikinews is public domain, whereas wikipedia is gfdl, and the two aren't compatible. GDFL work can't be turned into public domain material like that.. But then again, it is one wikimedia project going into another... --Zantastik 02:39, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

URGENT! Your attention and input is needed regarding a crucial issue facing wikinews.
Please go to the water cooler policy discussion at http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Water_cooler/policy#creating_.2F_deleting_dispute_flag_templates

Please participate in this discussion,regardless of your opinion. Paulrevere2005 13:05, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

South america/Arab article
Hey, when you're done adding stuff, drop a message on my talk page- i'll go through and copyed it some. :) Nice article! Lyellin 14:33, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

dateline
where in Brazil, it's an awfully large country? -Edbrown05 11:38, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Do I need to say that? Other stories dont have the exact location. However if it is necessary, you can say that I am reporting from São Paulo. --Carlosar 11:46, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I think you do need to say it, if the dateline template is to be used at all, since it further identifies the location from where the reporting is being done. -Edbrown05 11:59, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I am returning to Wikinews after being out a short time. I am asking because I dont know if some rule has changed when I was out.--Carlosar 12:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I am putting the location. See if it is right now. --Carlosar 12:22, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

translation review
I reviewed and edited New_denunciations_of_Brazilian_deputy_and_evidences_make_things_more_difficult_for_Lula. But some of the information was ambiguous to me, so I may have confused some of the facts. Please look over it and fix any errors I thereby introduced. Kevin Baastalk 3 July 2005 19:35 (UTC)


 * Looks good. i made a few grammar corrections. (one, i think)  the edit you made: " Furnas denied. Its directors resigned due to Jefferson's accusations against the company." is grammatically incorrect, and i dont' know what you meant to do here. "Furnas denied." is not a complete sentence.  what did furnas deny?   This sticks out like a sore thumb for an english reader, but I didn't revert it because I didn't know what you meant to do.  Also, one can't say objectively that that is the reason its directors resigned, this needs to be attributed to a source.  for example, if the directors said that that was their reason, it should say something like "Furnas' directors resigned, stating that their reasons were related to Jefferson's accusations against the company." Kevin Baastalk 4 July 2005 01:28 (UTC)


 * Yes, I understood. It should be good now. Excellent work. Kevin Baastalk 4 July 2005 12:37 (UTC)

BTW, your most common translation mistakes were:
 * use of the word "told". "told" must always be followed by an audience, such as "she told him that '...'", and "said" is more common.  (for what it's worth, "said" is a perfectly neutral word; it has no connotations, which is partly why it's so common.  "told" is more commanding and assertive, but if one truly wants to describe someone's speech as being assertive, one simply says "asserted", and this implies a very percetible difference in the speaker's gestures and tone of voice.)
 * "evidences" should always be "evidence". "evidence" is like "water": it is already plural.  Unlike "water", however, it is treated in a sentence as if it is singular.   This is because it does not refer to specific items as items, but to the fact that such items support the hypothesis that certain events occured.  "evidence" refers primarily to the support of the hypothesis (by material objects), and only secondarily to the material objects themselves as evidence.  Thus, insofar as "support" is always singular, "evidence" is always singular.  The material objects are "evidence", i.e. the material objects are "empirical support for a particular hypothesis". I hope this is clear.  In any case, "evidences" should always be "evidence". Kevin Baastalk 4 July 2005 12:37 (UTC)

Interviews
I am new to the whole concept of interviewing people and reporting on Wikinews and have recently conducted two related interviews with people at the centre of MPAA launches seven lawsuits against torrent, ed2k and usenet sites. I think they will be of value to Wikinews, but am unsure of how to proceed. Any tips would be handy - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 02:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Carlosar. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Carlosar~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)