User talk:Darkfrog24/Slowdown

In view of a misunderstanding on my last essay, while I invite the community to comment, add to, improve, and change this essay, I must specifically state that I do not want anyone to blank the entire thing, regardless of the level of detail in their change description. Thank you for respecting my wishes.

Also in view of developments with my last essay, I have made particular effort to make this clear that this is a draft, that this is at the moment my own idea, and that it has not yet been approved for use by the community. If you still feel that any newcomer to Wikinews may mistake this essay for a guideline or policy, please offer your advice on how to correct.

I think a technique like this one really could have helped us over the past few weeks. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Until you have actual successful experience with a dispute resolution technique (which you don't; your experience in resolving disputes here is to needlessly escalate them), writing an essay on that technique is a trolling, pointless waste of time and resources. Take it to Meta if you must write it but keep it off of Wikinews. Ca2james (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, this technique was inspired by 3RR, which has been around for a long time, and by my own experience noticing that waiting in between posts results in better quality. Its content directly addresses concerns. Darkfrog24 (talk) 15:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Then put it on Meta or your own wiki. Your essays on dispute resolution techniques you don't even employ yourself are tantamount to trolling. I was in the process of nominating the essay for deletion when it was deleted. Ca2james (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)