User talk:Edbrown05/Free speech banned @ ''Wikinews''

So what do you suggest we do? you can't ignore that neutralizer has caused some problems. The main problem with these two editors (IMHO) is not their ends (Well neuts ends were a little extreme in my opinion, but notwitstanding I don't think ultimatly it was his end) but their means. They were Blocked/RFDA not because they expressed their view, but in the process they pissed people off, and not just one person but several people, and badly. Like look at one of neuts last edits, he called somebodys (I can't remember who, might of been CSpurrier) edits stinky. How should we deal with that, without the downward spiral? Bawolff ☺☻ 05:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I think the ultimate moral of neuts story is, weather you believe in the Cabal or not, if you push lots of people, in the wrong way, for a long time, eventually they're not going to like you and whish you wern't there. If the user who you've pissed off happens to have special:block, its proablly not going to end in your favour. Bawolff ☺☻ 05:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)