User talk:Jdnutt~enwikinews

Wikileaks "smear"
I note numerous factual inaccuracies with your "smear job" against Julian Assange. Thus, I have labelled the story as a hoax. --Brian McNeil / talk 06:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikinews "manipulation"
Now I have come to recognize your obstinacy, you and Julian Assange are both Australians. Covering for your fellow countryman to protect what little good image he has left? Controlling and manipulating the news for your own good? Now there is a news report worth disseminating. JD Nutt (talk) 21:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Troll elsewhere, dolt. I am Scottish, it says so on my userpage. The name is a rather obvious clue in addition to that. And, you can't tell the difference between an editorial and a news report. I suggest applying for a job on Faux news. --Brian McNeil / talk 22:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Factual Smear, perhaps
Fact #1: "Submit Documents" link is broken to the secure side. Fact # 2: https is broken. Follow the link and view for yourself: http://wikileaks.org/wiki/WikiLeaks:Submissions. Fact #3: Private First Class Bradley E. Manning was charged by the U.S. Army with mishandling and transferring classified information in connection to the video and tens of thousands of classified cables from the State Department. Fact # 4: Assange said Wikileaks is currently re-engineering its submissions engine when he spoke on Friday at the Center for Investigative Journalism at City University in London, July 12th, 2010. Link Source: http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/071210-wikileaks-founder-reflects-on-apache.html

I can go on if the facts above are not found satisfactory to the readers.

--JDNutt / talk 18:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You can go on all you like; you've obviously not got the first clue about how to actually write a news story, but are an expert at launching a smear campaign. It is not "readers" you need to worry about, it is reviewers. And, your attempt at an article is not in the slightest bit in line with the policies as laid out in the welcome template. Put it on a blog if you can't adhere to policies on this site. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:06, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jdnutt. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jdnutt~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)