User talk:Mag883

-- 23:57, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

UoW
Hi,

If your article (Lower house passes Australia's carbon tax legislation) is part of the UoW classwork, can you let me know. Based on its age, it now qualifies as stale. Apologies for it not having been reviewed; the only feedback I can offer is to keep sources to a minimum - the reviewer has to read all you cite. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

Yes it's part of UoW classwork. I've had similar problems with the last 3 articles I've submitted. Thanks for the feedback- I've been listing reports and government documents and websites because I've been getting significant information from them, but should I be leaving these out of my sources for the purpose of getting my articles reviewed? Mag883 (talk) 01:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Mag883


 * List all that you use; that's what the Sources section is for: to record what was actually used. --Pi zero (talk) 01:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes I understand that, that's why I'm confused about being advised to limit my sources so I can actually get my articles reviewed. I'm accessing a number of sources to try to make my articles balanced and informed, but if apparently this is deterring reviewers and causing my articles to sit untouched until they go stale I'm really not sure what I'm supposed to do. Mag883 (talk) 09:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedians to the Games
Hi. :) As you're an Australian contributor, I thought you might be interested in Wikimedians to the Games, which is an opportunity to cover the Paralympic Games as a member of the press. As you've experience writing Wikinews articles, this should give you a leg up. :)  LauraHale (talk) 08:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)