User talk:Mrmiscellanious/Vote/1

i would have voted no on this sentence alone. "outcome of the poll is not intended to be used for any purposes by any persons" being a blatant lie--Whywhywhy 13:25, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It will not be used for any purposes by anyone - and if it is, render it null-and-void. They are only given to give myself an idea on how the community feels on issues.  --Mrmiscellanious 16:41, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * ima sorry to have to have to inform you that "They are only given to give myself an idea on how the community feels on issues" is a intended purpose, for a use by a person namely being you. This wouldnt bother me in a normal poll but your a editor and i am mystified how you cant tell this as a editor.--Whywhywhy 05:29, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * You've commented on your vote, I gave you leeway the first time. But it is now nullified.  --MrMiscellanious (talk) (contribs) 16:10, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * If the poll doesn't matter at all and you're the only one it should matter to why should we care whether a vote is nullified or not? Why nullify anything at all if a poll has no purpose? --Chiacomo (talk) 00:34, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

No-ish
Both Wikinews & Wikipedia slowly tend towards cliquishness & admin problems. I think all adminships should be temporary, like one year. Of course, size of userbase should be a major factor in such policies, as you can't have rotating admins if you don't have enough people. :) Not you personally, just a comment on adminships in general.  - 172.177.30.116 22:39, 19 November 2005 (UTC)