User talk:N2e

Hi, N2e. Thanks for your edits on the SpaceX article. We didn't keep all of the material you submitted (I explained my thoughts in the edit summaries), but we did keep some, and your help and interest are surely appreciated! --Pi zero (talk) 23:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, thanks for the welcome. As I indicated on my (new Wikinews) user page, I'm totally new to Wikinews.  I certainly don't know the culture, policies and standards over here.


 * But as to that article, I'm certainly not trying to make the caption too long. Was just trying to correct/clarify what actually flew.  The caption as it stands now is less correct than with the changes I had made.  Since I don't know the editing standards, I'll just let you folks deal with it.  Also, there is the context that Wikipedia links can provide to the specific test vehicle, and to the description of the test facility in Texas, should that be useful to your purposes.


 * Should you want to communicate with me, probably best to ping me on my Wikipedia Talk page, as I don't expect to be here in Wikinews very much.


 * Cheers. N2e (talk) 03:28, 25 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Less correct? It's less detailed, but we certainly wouldn't want it to be incorrect.  Is there something actually wrong about the caption as it now stands?


 * There are two levels of procedures for addressing problems in an article more than 24 hours after publication: For things that aren't considered part of the substance of the article, like categories, or what is or isn't wikilinked, or spelling errors that don't affect the meaning, we can just change those things.   For substantive changes, although we can't directly change the article, we can and do issue a correction when there's an error in an article that's more than 24 hours past publication.  Image captions are in a sort of twilight, between being part of the article (and thus archived) and not part of the article (and thus changeable).  --Pi zero (talk) 04:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)