User talk:Wishmaster68

Hi
Please do not edit articles that hae been published for more than two days. Thanks, Anonymous101talk 14:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Anonymous101talk 14:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how articles should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * Audio Wikinews could always use more contributors
 * And of course, stories need writing!

Review
Firstly, here are the reasons we have to review edits
 * To stop vandalism
 * To allow for facts to be verified.

1: Why is that necessary here and not at Wikipedia?
 * Because so many of our articles are linked to from the Main Page and to get listed on Google News, we need to have a review process. (and we are trying to get listed on Google News). Also, Wikipedia is considering getting the same extension installed.

2: Who decided (and by what method was the decision made) that this systemic review process is advisable?
 * The Wikinews community, unanimously, in several votes.Anonymous101talk 18:50, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Secondly, the npov tag was removed because it had already been published for quite a while and no one else had seen this problem. Anonymous101talk 14:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)