Wikinews:Deletion requests/Archives/Deleted Archive 10

'''This archive is closed. If you wish to add a closed deletion request, go to Deletion requests/Archives and find the latest archive.'''

Apple stops distribution of 17-inch PowerPC iMac
A bit old. from two months ago. Bawolff ☺☻ 20:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Yugoslavia
Country doesn't exist anymore. Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina, Category:Croatia, Category:Slovenia and Category:Serbia and Montenegro can be used instead. -- Deprifry|+T+ 17:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless category. Current events (which is what WN describes) arent goint to refer to Yugoslavia - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 20:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Man accused of avoiding security at Californian airport
Abandoned - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 21:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per listing -  Amgine | talk en.WN 06:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Roy Walker to visit Strathclyde Union
Abandoned and unsorced - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 04:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per request -  Amgine | talk en.WN 05:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Uproarious tension in Greek match
Abandoned - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 04:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per request -  Amgine | talk en.WN 05:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Containership strands on river Schelde in the Netherlands
Well and truly abandoned - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 00:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per request -  Amgine | talk en.WN 05:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Teachers fighting terrorism
POV, lack of activity, unsourced - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 00:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per request - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 05:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Human rights
This category does not meet the NPOV requirment- It has perspective, different people can make what they think of it. Also based on the deletion debate of Category:Terrorism - "Terrorism is in the eye of the beholder". Human Rights can be said to be in the eye of the beholder. Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 21:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Self-identification as "human rights workers, activists, etc." usually matches the definition.  Of course, there is nothing wrong with two "human rights" groups being opposed to one another.  Nyarlathotep 11:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agree with Nyarlathotep. The category is called "Human rights" and not "Human rights violation", the latter would indeed face similar issues as Category:Terrorism, the former does not. --vonbergm 20:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. even if i understand Brian POV Jacques Divol 17:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I just want to point out I have no prob with this category, but when category Terrorism was put up for deletion below, and as it looks like it might be deleted, I feel all categorys that have a POV should go- not just Terrorism Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 21:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Shows favoritism to one set of items defined as "human rights", leads into user's own perception.  --MrMiscellanious (talk) – 22:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. This category differs from Terrorism in that people will choose to self-associate with it allowing uncontroversial tagging of an article with the category.  Beyond that... --Brian McNeil / talk 22:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Impossible to define neutrally and objectively. Internally inconsistent (id est: at what point does freedom of religious practice interfere with freedom of speech? who defines what either of these are?) - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 22:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Amgines & MrM's reason. Jason Safoutin 18:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Abstain - Cartman02au <SMALL>(Talk)(AU Portal)</SMALL> 00:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Take the death penalty, for example. People who support the use of the death penalty don't consider it to be a human rights issue, and so wouldn't place it in this category, whereas people who oppose the death penalty would. Therefore, the existence of the category itself is not neutral. Another example is abortion... would it be okay to start adding abortion-related articles to this category? Many people consider it to be a human rights issue. - Borofkin 00:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * it would be reasonable to categorise death penalty/abortion/similar "controversial HR" articles under HR when such concerns are explicitly cited in the article. Doldrums 06:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't agree. To give an article the category "Human rights" implies that there is consensus that the article concerns a human rights issue. In the case of the death penalty, abortion, and others, no such consensus exists. If, by your rationale, we accept "Human rights" as a category in abortion articles, then we should also reasonably accept "Category:Pro-choice" and "Category:Baby murder". - Borofkin 06:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Of the 30 articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3 alone would place the vast majority of Wikinews articles into this category:
 * Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
 * Presuming this category is preserved I assume we will then begin categorizing our articles appropriately. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 06:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * perhaps i haven't expressed myself well. i do not intend wikinews to come up with definitions of nebulous concepts or take a stand on controversial issues. but i think wikinews should have "typical" news categories(including terrorism, HR, non-proliferation). and i think we can "objectively" categorise by guidelines such as "categorise only if the 'category term' is explicitly stated in article" (so a death penalty article which states HR concerns will be tagged, not otherwise). one possible difficulty with this is the blanket use of one general statement " said DP raises HR concerns" (a general statement, not made in reference to the particular story) in every DP article. but i think this can be handled. (such a blanket use would usually call for to be very notable, use of such a statement can be contested for POV, relevence, etc).
 * reg. borofkin's concern, i'm not sure if our use of categories amount to endorsing particular views(especially if a guideline such as the above is followed). at least i regard categories simply as a search/indexing feature.
 * reg. amgine's example, the same guideline will take out most wikinews article(unless of course, in each article, somebody is talking about the application of Art. 3 to that story). Doldrums 06:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * That is exactly the POV I'm trying to point out. Almost all news is about Human Rights. This category, however, will only single out a specific subset of those articles, and that subset will be highly biased in favour of some governments or ideologies, and oppoosed to other governments or ideologies. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 06:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * i don't quite get how it is pov. any govt. or ideology will have the same opportunity: get ur statement in the article, and the article gets categorised accordingly. this gives it the required neutrality, for instance a US statement abt HR in china or a chinese statement abt HR in US will both get the same tag. (what will remain is a "bias in coverage": what nubian tribesmen see as HR won't make it very often on wikinews, what US state department see does. but that is a different matter).
 * i am not quite convinced by the "all news is ..." argument. this would make all our categories subcategories to HR. (does wikinews use subcats?) and therefore a subcat would take precedence over the parent-cat for most news. (and whatever is left gets HR!). Doldrums 07:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep agree Nyarlathotep. Bawolff ☺☻[[image:smile.png]]
 * Delete. I agree with Borofkin --Cspurrier 02:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I buy vonbergm's reasoning. Neutralizer 03:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * KEEP I belatedly opposed the deletion of the Terrorism category. Human rights area at the core of almost every news story. A note on POV: POV is always an issue when ANY category is used. It is human nature to put things into perspective. Even thinking about the notion of NPOV is a POV. So is creating and deleting categories. Human rights is a useful category. Note on Categories: Indeed I think categories will become ever more important over the development of Wikinews, particularly in terms of archiving and searching. So, in an effort to construct some precison in open-source community media-making, I have added two categories this week: Refugees and Deportations. Yours in semiotic service... --elliot_k 17:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Serbian Security Service said to hunt Mladic
Abandoned. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 17:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Not sure I agree that its too brief, but it does have formating issues. Nyarlathotep 11:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Austevoll bridges
Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 20:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Older talk page. -Edbrown05 08:06, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I just speedied it- talk page of deleted article Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 20:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Category:Terrorism
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

This category requires a judgement call which does not meet the WN:NPOV requirements. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 05:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC) <STRIKE>*Keep. I agree with Edbrown05 - there is such a thing as terrorism and as it impacts our daily lives there should be a category for it - Cartman02au <SMALL>(Talk)(AU Portal)</SMALL> 01:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)</STRIKE>
 * Delete I'm breaking my rule against voting. Category expresses a POV. --Chiacomo (talk) 05:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. --MrMiscellanious (talk) – 05:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. What, there is no such thing as terrorism? -Edbrown05 08:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Not sufficiently objectively, no. What about so-called eco-terrorists like ELF, who painstakingly avoids harming anyone?  What about various U.S. millitary tactics?  What about every small revolutionary army in the word?  Big stupid fight potential.  Muslims/Chrisitians OTOH may argue over who is an is not a real Muslim/Christian, but we can objectively assign Category:Islam/Category:Christianity based upon self-identification, location, etc.  Nyarlathotep 10:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * After one look at the Portal-esque category, delete. --Brian McNeil / talk 20:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep There are a few articles in it, and as Edbrown05 said "What, there is no such thing as terrorism?" Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 20:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - No-one self identifies as a terrorist. There is debate as to whether an act is terrorism or not, and as such it isn't a neutral term. - Borofkin 01:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Terrorism is a POV term, it is bad when we use it in an article and even worse when we use it as a category --Cspurrier 03:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete sinblox (talk) 06:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

It was created on the 8th of July, why has this not been listed earlier? And If this gets deleted for POV, the same could be argued for a cat like ‘’Human Rights’’ or.... Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 06:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * You are correct, it should have been listed earlier, but that is no reason to not list it now. And you are also right that Category:Human rights is questionable. It would be an interesting vote/debate, should someone decide to have it. - Borofkin 06:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * IMHO, Category:Human rights is just fine since you can use self-identification to get a close approximation to the actual use of the term. Of course, there is absolutely nothing wrong with both sides of a debate self-identifying as human rights (like say abortion).  :)  Normal use of terrorism OTOH does not remotely match with self-identification as terrorists.  A fairly NPOV category would be Category:Civilian Casualties, or just Category:Conflict.  Nyarlathotep 10:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Anyway, it looks like this debate is headed towards "no consensus". Nyarlathotep 10:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete- this is a no-brainer; once you think about it a bit,imo. Terrorism is in the eye of the beholder. Dropping 500 pound bombs on Baghdad was/is the worst type of "terrorism" in my book. Neutralizer 13:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - After thinking about it for longer than 5 minutes I want to change my vote to delete. I agree 100% with Neutralizer, dropping bombs on a city for a reason made up of lies is as bad as any other "terrorist act" yet we do not call it that way. I am sure we can use the Politics and Conficts, Crime and law and War category instead - Cartman02au <SMALL>(Talk)(AU Portal)</SMALL> 21:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry for breaking the No Commenting rules above. I use the 'Terrorism' category sometimes. Its a pity I fully missed the discussion on this one. I would argue that there is indeed a necessity for the cat. Its probably not worth the words now, considering the agrgument has been won, and the discussion has been. Is there a way discussions like this can be flagged or something? Cheers --elliot_k 16:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Comic artists response to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
Abandoned. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 17:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to find time to do it, and if I ever did, I can read the deleted version myself to work on it. It could be speedy deleted as "request of sole contributor", execpt that a wikipedian started it as a one line article, but I think this was also my fault.  So yes it should be deleted.  Nyarlathotep 11:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The New Tribes Missions forced to leave Venezuela
Abandoned. --Chiacomo (talk) 04:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

2006 Super 14 season begins
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Abandoned. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 21:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Sharon's Condition Critical After Surgery
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Abandoned - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 21:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Abandoned, seems to be no interest in completing the article - Cartman02au <SMALL>(Talk)(AU Portal)</SMALL> 21:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Massive gas leak in Edinburgh
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Marked abandoned for 8 days, no further edits made -- Cartman02au <SMALL>(Talk)(AU Portal)</SMALL> 10:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Obelisk SRC approaching Beta 2
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an advertisement and the only source is a blog. See talk page. Also the blog source even has the "contributer" in the comments area. I believe the author of the blog is the writer of the article and he is attempting "self-promotion". Jason Safoutin 15:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Only because the author of the article is the Chief Programmer and Software Architect of the article being mentioned. As such and is self-promotion. This makes it hard to see the article as anything other than PR - Cartman02au <SMALL>(Talk)(AU Portal)</SMALL> 21:35, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as author and a an exciting beta release to help all students is news.Gary Kirk 10:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm guessing this isn't going anyplace with that reply from Gary Kirk, but I'd like to point out that wikinews doesn't, strictly speaking, object to people posting stories about stuff they are involved in.  But, in many many cases, the involved person is unable to work effectively with the community.  I'm also not sure if we should carry news about beta releases in general.  Nyarlathotep 11:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Its an advertisement. I flagged it initially as NPOV and a stub as well.  I could also have tagged it for Sources given that the only page cited was the creator's own blog.  When there is a new, innovative product, I have no problem seeing it as news.  However, this is a beta 2 release, there is no supporting information, the article appears to be self-serving and there is nothing new or noteworthy about the release of an LMS.  If it was the first open source LMS, that woould be news, but MOODLE, which is much more popular and has a site that tells me what it is, is more newsworthy.  Sorry, but this is so far from being news and suffers a permanent NPOV problem.  As such it should be deleted. -Drew 15:00, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Egypt wins African Nations Cup
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Marked abandoned for 8 days, no further edits made -- Cartman02au <SMALL>(Talk)(AU Portal)</SMALL> 10:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

February 21
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Folkpartiet's Karin Pilsaeter forced to take a breath test
Beyond repair, unsourced. --Brian McNeil / talk 17:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I have added npov and sources tags to the article, but I think that the article would involve too much work to tidy up - Cartman02au <SMALL>(Talk)(AU Portal)</SMALL>

Category:Archived
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I came across this on my mission from dog to protect everything. It has been applied in a highly irregular manner, and I'm not going to put it on every article I protect. Thus I think it is inappropriate and should be deleted. --Brian McNeil / talk 19:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support deletion. Nyarlathotep 14:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose deletion. This is designed to prevent old stories that are recently edited (such as to add the PD tag) from showing up on the front page under the OR heading. --Cspurrier 15:56, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * From the sounds of it thats not what the category was meant for. Delete Bawolff ☺☻[[image:smile.png]] 18:40, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Petitioners seek to recall Canadian Minister
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Abandoned, disputed. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 06:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Category:Official misconduct
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Encyclopedic category, only two articles. --Brian McNeil / talk 23:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It is very rare for me to say this about a category, but delete. We should concentrate on more general categories, before even thinking about something like this. Also has a very high potential for POV. Ditto, for one below. Bawolff ☺☻[[image:smile.png]] 00:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Category:Traditional rights
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Encyclopedic category, only one article. --Brian McNeil / talk 20:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

MySpace banned in most places
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 23:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Read it. Could be speedy, but not sure. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Terror In The Land Of Terror
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Talk about POV. could userfy, but I don't think its worth it. Bawolff ☺☻ 01:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Special legislative act supports Boy Scouts
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC) Copyvio, POV, not news. - Avenue 14:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

It is not a copyright violation; it IS news, and is not biased, being published on both Drudge and Huffington.

This is an obvious attempt at censorship from one who disagrees with the legislation mentioned in the article.
 * Delete This is a copyvio --Brian McNeil / talk 14:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Karabagh peace settlement
Abandoned, settlement did not happen. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 09:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 12:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Sheikh Mohammed Awards Zayed Prize to Kofi Annan
Copyvio, abandoned. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 08:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 12:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Refusal to compromise dragging out Transnistria talks, U.S. says
Copyvio, abandoned. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 08:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 12:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Perlos threats to kick out thousand employees in Finland
Abandoned, disputed. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 08:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 12:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

E-mail filtering by Swiss Federal Authorities raises constitutional concerns
Disputed, abandoned - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 01:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd say userfy, execpt its contributors are all anons, oh well. :(  Nyarlathotep 02:27, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * You could make it a subpage of an anon IP. Bawolff ☺☻[[image:smile.png]] 22:59, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 12:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Egypt win the African Cup of Nations
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I've just speedy deleted it. Nyarlathotep 02:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Duplicate Only one sentence too. Jason Safoutin 01:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Steelers win Super Bowl XL

 * Delete Abandoned. Only one sentence. No sources although it is true. Jason Safoutin 01:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 12:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Steve Kubby still in jail
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

not news, probally abandoned. Bawolff ☺☻ 01:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Iraqi Police Captured
Was tagged by someone other then me. Looks like abandoned stub. Bawolff ☺☻ 20:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 19:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Internet worm impersonates BBC
Abandoned. hasn't been edited for 5-6 days. No sources. Bawolff ☺☻ 20:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 19:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Greece prepares for extreme winter weather
Tagged and dashed. Bawolff ☺☻ 20:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 19:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Battery Charges?
abandoned. Bawolff ☺☻ 23:31, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

--Deprifry|+T+ 19:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Kings Park sex ed scandal
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Copy-vio, also I'm not sure how newswrothy it is/ sounds a bit opinion/non-neutral to me. Bawolff ☺☻ 23:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Steve Kubby
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Not news, also is nealy the same as Steve Kubby still in jail (which is also not news} Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 01:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Fluoride is Harmful to Your Health
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Copyvio. hmmm, distilled water is looking nice, Bawolff ☺☻ 01:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Corona Space Surveillance Centre (CSSC)
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Copyvio, of an about page! Bawolff ☺☻ 00:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

New Safety Equipment for Mining Employees
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Abandoned. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 18:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

MPAA is accused of piracy for unauthorised copying of a movie
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Abandoned, copyvio - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 17:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

LTTE will not return to war - Norway
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Abandoned, copyvio - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 17:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Major storm slams the Northeast
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Didn't happen. Jason Safoutin 17:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Matthew Davey
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Not news, doesn't look like it can be news. -- 24.61.119.222 12:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is per the nomination. --24.61.119.222 12:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if the article is not improved. This is a speedy candidate, and has had the tag applied to indicate this is the case. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 17:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Steve Kubby, Libertarian Party activist, grows dangerously ill in US custody
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 21:17, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Never published, superceded by Steve Kubby, co-author of California Proposition 215, grows dangerously ill in US custody, which is published.
 * Delete StrangerInParadise 03:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Category:Politics (United States)
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:26, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Cough(DPL) and going to be almost never used. Bawolff ☺☻[[image:smile.png]] 03:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 15:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Chávez accused of anti-Semitism in Christmas speech (Undeletion Request)
—M ESSED R OCKER (talk) 01:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * undelete Article was never abandoned (continual edits daily, & edited within 24 hours before listed as abandoned. Plus there was no consensus to delete.[] Neutralizer 20:14, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Linked so I can see the article. Bawolff ☺☻[[image:smile.png]] 01:36, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No edits between the 23rd when it was tagged, and the 28th when it was deleted. Seems to be sourced though. Bawolff ☺☻[[image:smile.png]] 01:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Might have been hard to edit as the complaint wasn't understood too well, it seems. Neutralizer 03:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * see also: Deletion_requests/Archives/Deleted_Archive_9.


 * keep deleted I tagged the story and listed it here, because the story was created January 2, 2006, 21 days later it still was not published. I did not have a problem with the story except some minor pov issues, but 21 days is way too many. --Cspurrier 05:00, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Undelete, if theres no issue with the story, but don't bump date. Bawolff ☺☻[[image:smile.png]] 05:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted No edits other than tag since 22 Jan, article was not publishable at that time. - <span style="font: italic 10pt/12pt cursive;"> Amgine | talk en.WN 17:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd support undeletion if it was a "date neutral" story, such as one about some scientific discovery or other "slow news" subjects, but here we failed to cover it when it was news, so it seems a tad revisionist given the topic.  OTOH, I don't object to undeletion either.  Why don't you just add a very small note about the comments to Chávez's wikipedia page (with links to the news sources)?  Nyarlathotep 12:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)