Wikinews:Flagged revisions/Requests for permissions/JJLiu112 (2)


 * Closed as successful. [24Cr][talk] 19:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * See the previous request at WN:Flagged revisions/Requests for permissions/JJLiu112

I am pleased to nominate JJLiu112 to become a reviewer. Today we carried out a co-review of Taliban further restrict women's rights. They asked all the right questions and explained what they would do as a reviewer. They also carried out a thorough copyedit to the article. I feel they have shown the correct level of maturity, patience (about three hours spent on the review!) and knowledge required for a reviewer. I recommend the community support this request for permissions. , please confirm your acceptance of this nomination by signing just below. -- [24Cr][talk] 18:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I gladly accept. --JJLiu112 (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Questions and comments
I have just gave you my support, nevertheless I would appreciate some feedback on these questions: Thank you for accepting the nomination. - Xbspiro (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Could you please elaborate on the method by which you examined Taliban further restrict women's rights? What happened during the review, and in what order?
 * Assume an article about an unfamiliar place or process had been submitted. Please pick an unfamiliar subject and elaborate on how and where you would check the background of such a news event.
 * Would you, as a reviewer, suggest sources to the author of a failed article? Why?
 * How do you think reviewing would fit into your timetable?

Votes

 * As nominator. [24Cr][talk] 18:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * All I can do is wish you the best of luck, and that I look forward to seeing more excellent contributions from your side. Henrymyman (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Let that egg hatch. - Xbspiro (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * We need some more reviewers in this project and you seem to be the perfect candidate. 2006nishan178713t@lk 15:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)