Wikinews:Flagged revisions/Requests for permissions/Removal/Gopher65

The user okay'ed with being de-sysopped. I notified the reviewer twice last year about having not reviewed articles for more than two years. Someone requested a review on a now-deleted article, but Gopher65 didn't reply or do anything else regarding that. I know enforcing WN:PEP is challenging or irritating to others, especially when the project has a very small community. However, another user's reviewer tools were taken away recently, implying that PEP should apply, even when reluctant to do so. --George Ho (talk) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Questions and comments
It's been 7 days, pretty clear consensus here. Tagging our active admin (minus Bddpaux, who has said they will stay away from RFP for 1 year). Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Votes

 * - Inactive and said they are fine with it more than a year ago. Hope they will become active again and reapply.Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * uncontroversial. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hope they come back at some point! A.S. Thawley (talk) (calendar) 18:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * - straightforward case. Leaderboard (talk) 12:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * per Leaderboard. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Permission removed and note left at user talk page. [24Cr][talk] 00:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)