Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Bureaucrat/RockerballAustralia


 * Successful. --Green Giant (talk) 02:13, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

— bureaucratship
RbAus is one more long-term Wikinewsie, who has served as an admin and reviewer (while also being an AR with scoop access). They have been quite helpful, just like the other two candidates, helping new comers and even experienced editors alike. They are excellent candidate for 'crat whom I trust can serve well and would like to nominate them for b'crat, provided they accept the nomination. •–• 15:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Questions and comments
Nomination happily accepted. --RockerballAustralia contribs 01:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! What in your opinion makes a contributor a good candidate for bureaucratship? Interested to know your insight, though I have already placed my vote :). (I am asking this to everyone today, to probably understand the key values and key points that are being considered important.) Thanks. Gryllida (talk) 23:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * A good 'crat should have a good understanding of Wikinews' core policies – namely WN:NPOV, WN:COI, WN:C. They should be on top of any policy they may need to apply before they need to apply it. They should also explain in as much depth as possible any decision they make as they are making it. --RockerballAustralia contribs 00:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Votes

 * Strong support as the nominator! •–• 15:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * . Clear commitment to the Wikimedia project. --JJLiu112 (talk) 16:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * per nominator. --Green Giant (talk) 22:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sort of surprised Rockerball hasn't been one already —chaetodipus (talk &middot; contribs) 03:39, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * per nominator. --LivelyRatification (talk) 05:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your commitment. --Gryllida (talk) 23:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep!--Bddpaux (talk) 00:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)