Wikinews:Requests for permissions/CheckUser/Brian

Brian (Brian New Zealand)
The standard checkuser policy requires at least two users to have checkuser to provide oversight for one another. I would like to suggest that be granted this status. He is an accredited Wikinews reporter and bureaucrat, and an OTRS member, trusted Commons user, and Wikipedia administrator as well. It has been a pleasure working with him in the past, and I feel he is well-suited to this additonal responsibility. GreenReaper (talk) 23:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I accept this nom, as we do need two cu per policy, and well, personally I feel I have been non controversial as a CU. I have always been able to process CU promptly – even during my less editing this year, and would like to able to continue to serve wikinews in this manner. I also will not vote in this election, due to my name been nominated Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 23:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Votes

 * 1) as nominator. GreenReaper (talk) 23:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Established checkuser, should be able to use the tools effectively. Cary Bass (talk) 23:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3)  - kiwi kiwi kiwi - oi oi oi A very established experienced CU, what more do you need? :) :DD..-- Cometstyles 23:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4)  - Let's have an all Brian CU team! (unless Craig can be convinced to stand again) ++Lar: t/c 23:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5)  - of course :) - Alison (talk) 01:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) 100% - An excellent user, good contact and fantastic WN contributor, also consistent presence on IRC. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 01:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) . --Jcart1534 (talk) 01:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) - Per nom. Cirt (talk) 01:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) I find this Brian's work to be outstanding as well and I trust him completely with such tools. Mike Halterman (talk) 02:35, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 10)  "Commons Trusted User" ROFL.  That is not much in the way of a credential ^_^  -- Shakata Ga Nai  ^_^ 02:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 05:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) -- Herby  talk thyme 07:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) per the usual. terinjokes | Talk 07:20, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) --Brian McNeil / talk 07:29, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) Anonymous101talk 07:31, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 16) support DerHexer (talk) 07:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 17) Daniel (talk) 11:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 18) --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 19) I have full trust in this Brian aswell. He is another of our longest standing members and fully deserves to be trusted in this way. --Skenmy(t•c•w) 13:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 20) I completely trust Brian and am confident in his ability to carry out the required tasks. Adambro (talk) 15:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 21) Long time user, and trusted. rootology (T ) 15:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 22) Of course Naerii (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 23) Yep - David Gerard (talk) 18:29, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 24) Sure, I have experience with him from other wikis and no problems.  Cbrown1023  talk  18:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 25) Durova (talk) 01:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 26) Sympathy because your Rugby team sucks... ;-) giggy (O) 05:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * , I concur with Giggy! John Vandenberg (talk) 06:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) --Nzgabriel | Talk 08:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) per just about everything already said. Chris Mann (Say hi!|Stalk me!) 02:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - Has my full support and confidence, has had for years. -  Amgine | t 03:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Jacques Divol (talk) 20:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) per my vote for Brianmc.--Poetlister (talk) 12:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)