Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Removal/Submarine (admin)

User:Submarine
Well im gunna put this user up for de-admining due to lack of use of the tools/inactivity. This one should be pretty simple IMO, as the user has NEVER used there tools, yes, 0 admin actions ever.--Mark Talk to me 17:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * also, this users last edit was just over a year ago. --Mark Talk to me 17:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Votes

 * per nom --Mark Talk to me 17:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * per nom - in addition to nom statement, user has made no contributions to the project for over a year. Cirt - (talk) 17:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * removal due to inactivity. Adambro - (talk) 22:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * inactive --Ryan524 - (talk) 23:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * per nom. --Skenmy(t•c•w) 09:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * --Brian McNeil / talk 12:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Daniel (talk) 13:54, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * removal of rights. This user is clearly inactive on Wikinews. Theres no point in allowing him to keep the admin tools if he hasn't edited for months. If they return and request the admin tools back, however, I would probably support them. User:Anonymous101  17:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I oppose removal of adminship due to inactivity as a matter of personal opinion. I also oppose the proposed policy WN:IP. The only difference between these requests and an automatic removal seems to be that here, they don't get notified by email. --SVTCobra 19:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I disagree with WN:IP. -- IlyaHaykinson (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Per SVT and Ilya. --+Deprifry+ 11:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I talked to David earlier this week. He knows the debate is going on and doesn't seem to care either way. TheCustomOfLife (talk) 10:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)