Wikinews talk:Briefs/February 8, 2014

I took the article off the review queue, because minimum size requirement is 3 paragraphs and the first paragraph doesn't answer the basic questions. It still doesn't, I don't know where the session happened. --Gryllida 06:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I gather there was some confusion surrounding this article. It's meant to be a Shorts article, but there are formatting problems; I'm writing some review comments now.  --Pi zero (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Please move
Please move this into space of User:Charmayne18 Crtew (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ (was in fact already scheduled for about now). --Pi zero (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Why was this un-userspaced? It was userspaced because it was an abandoned one written by a USI student. Heavy Water (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I was going to delete it originally. At the time I was also trying to get the Briefs and Shorts organised (see the list on WN:Briefs), in an attempt to see if they could be revived as an ancillary project. There are quite a few that were never published but were just left to linger. As you can see from the list, there are far more red links than blue. I decided against trying revival any further, after we adopted the hundred-word minimum limit. [24Cr][talk] 18:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)