Wikinews talk:Briefs/March 24, 2012

Script status
I've reviewed each item in the script, and made some changes to each (except in one case I think my only edit was typesetting, with no effect on the audio).

Unfortunately, the item on Savage on Santorum on Savage was seriously flawed, and I pulled it. If it's to be included, it would need a complete rewrite, and then rechecked of course. The first sentence was vague, the middle only mentioned things Santorum had said about Savage, and the end wans't even grammatical (one suspects something might have gone wrong during editing). Apparently, a brief of that article ought to say something about remarks by each, and say something about the history of the neologism (though it wouldn't make any sense to recite the definition; if nothing else, that would be excessively long). --Pi zero (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2012 (UTC)